IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Fri, 07 July 2017 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41591317C2; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyqfdgVOHriC; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7BA129B36; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=7vUzevS01wMiIErAsxHwTvyHDN9QnQYwyCacj5bZscE=; b=lND2YDCH3jdjwWsjaEuIz+HPUk2ShRl3Je/PUHZely3WnT9l/s2gXOOuMpJAVIFNBVEMeX2lh577Z+8KAmXafUPYfDkkpLjlQyhmE7r/1BF/UXR9vraGIqfSH7/y6iVDzRjsWNNVCB7N4ub/6swuVicLZs0itqwtjFD1azfonuk=
Received: from MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.173.52.7) by MWHPR21MB0479.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.172.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1261.3; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:17:34 +0000
Received: from MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.7]) by MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.7]) with mapi id 15.01.1261.007; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:17:34 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
CC: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks
Thread-Index: AdL2j89KknngpoFTRaiO7w0jXk0ylAApAZzNAAZX9MA=
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 18:17:34 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB0125F498B0633C3F6C7EB3CCA3AA0@MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR21MB0125E2464E9B3A25E0FB8967A3D50@MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <f5b1spsl1mr.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <f5b1spsl1mr.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: inf.ed.ac.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; inf.ed.ac.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [167.220.1.79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR21MB0479; 7: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
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d074b94f-2977-4516-77df-08d4c56470ed
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0479;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR21MB0479:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR21MB0479638D92ED14EE553A579DA3AA0@MWHPR21MB0479.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(236129657087228)(189930954265078)(90097320859284)(181193635805523)(219752817060721);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(61425038)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(2017060910066)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0479; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0479;
x-forefront-prvs: 0361212EA8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39850400002)(377454003)(13464003)(252514010)(7696004)(66066001)(5660300001)(77096006)(33656002)(76176999)(50986999)(54356999)(8936002)(478600001)(2906002)(229853002)(110136004)(102836003)(6306002)(3846002)(54906002)(9686003)(10090500001)(6116002)(4326008)(81166006)(99286003)(38730400002)(55016002)(8676002)(6246003)(3280700002)(6506006)(74316002)(5005710100001)(305945005)(6436002)(7736002)(2900100001)(3660700001)(8990500004)(966005)(189998001)(2950100002)(6916009)(14454004)(25786009)(53546010)(86362001)(86612001)(575784001)(10290500003)(53936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR21MB0479; H:MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jul 2017 18:17:34.6844 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR21MB0479
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/TUw78Kkx0ZKuPvLz45v4xv_8Fig>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 18:17:39 -0000

Thanks Henry for the pointer, that is very relevant and I will cite it (and some points in it)
in a future version of this draft.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 8:15 AM
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org; art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks

Dave Thaler writes:

> Recently we've seen multiple requests (including from three different
> SDOs) and discussions on different lists regarding using URI schemes 
> for application-layer protocols that can operate over multiple 
> transport stacks (e.g., UDP, TCP, websockets, HTTP, etc.). This draft 
> summarizes the various technical discussions and issues raised.
>
> Not sure if there is any regular meeting time available at IETF, but I 
> at least wanted to share this more broadly for visibility, and to 
> solicit additional feedback.

The W3C TAG devoted a fair amount of effort to this issue about 12 years ago, and our thinking at the time (2005) is recorded here:

  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2Ftag%2Fdoc%2FSchemeProtocols.html&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C8ef6fcd0d8f64853727a08d4c54af6f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636350373145131799&sdata=7tkNgY68gW0EwKJQGU676kclstxp88Pf1CveKwVzdmM%3D&reserved=0

which may provide a useful independent perspective, albeit somewhat dated in some respects.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.ltg.ed.ac.uk%2F~ht%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C8ef6fcd0d8f64853727a08d4c54af6f5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636350373145141803&sdata=N5MVPCx%2BN%2FeOzkFQLmC%2BPeq9JClVApoWwysXCPq4FGc%3D&reserved=0
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email