Re: [Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Sun, 21 January 2018 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C587F126FDC for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:06:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtSjGoeJT5xw for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay14.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay14.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB22124319 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.206]) by relay14.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1edDSV-0000tm-lP; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:06:43 +0000
Received: from gklyne38.plus.com ([81.174.129.24] helo=spare-94.atuin.ninebynine.org) by smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1edDSV-0009oN-K9; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:06:43 +0000
Message-ID: <5A647445.5050200@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:06:45 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
CC: uri-review@ietf.org
References: <20180117144647.GC5245@biggie> <4d910f73-9ca4-c661-0ff1-f508b8ccbed2@gmx.de> <FCE36985-BDC4-419E-97AB-CC061B43A9C7@tzi.org> <CAMBJEmU2s8B8Rvz-GW=3n4Dt0c_qCQHzm1M52GpAXn+qQmHzvw@mail.gmail.com> <AFAEFB6C-CD3E-4BD1-B1B5-35E9749D45FC@tzi.org> <CAMBJEmWgTasuKMPhTXUBLgSuDKBXo+M1Eq98t-8=Ya+kKqgYXQ@mail.gmail.com> <BB6CCAEA-7604-4056-AFD4-A5FE87559973@tzi.org> <CAMBJEmUDEGz=vLQN-XGpkS7cF+TFAyc98RsYJSKDRkw5bJn7ww@mail.gmail.com> <65DA395C-3DD5-4E46-BB44-4660578F681E@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <65DA395C-3DD5-4E46-BB44-4660578F681E@gbiv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
X-Oxmail-Spam-Status: score=0.0 tests=none
X-Oxmail-Spam-Level: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/VoTaQFDqmy5LrkMNbtzEQF40pTo>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:06:48 -0000

On 19/01/2018 17:05, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:30 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>; wrote:
>>
>> OK, so after a bit back and forth, newtitle is:
>>
>> The Archive and Packaging Pointer (app) URI scheme
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-soilandreyes-app-03.html
>
> I don't think it is reasonable to reserve the name "app" for that purpose.
> "arcp" would make more sense and not mislead 99% of the people who see it.

+1 (wearing personal hat)

As and when this comes to me for IANA review, I'd like to see in this discussion 
list (uri-review@ietf.org) some stronger indication of consensus on the choice 
of scheme name.  This doesn't formally affect requirements for provisional 
registration (though I'd me minded to request addition of a reference to this 
discussion), but it would have an effect on any subsequent request to progress 
to a permanent registration.

#g
--