Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri(Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers)to Proposed Standard]
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 October 2009 01:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FFF3A6842; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIJNDH5Ws6oH; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B4B3A6810; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so1086407pxi.32 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zOyCNVvP/YIeZPMA+ITz/gaok5paeG0KdfGJfOMvBE0=; b=Yc9MlsPz31KWatI9aGRjNwfYTNJ+KV9oMrCIOgWT1w525tx+BoswHZ/mURliNxvRB5 EXFYtjWLpqi3X2utZD3g30LhkGORD2Pvj5DrKfk9Qja7Ln3eUVDS3ueT/0Azjpn7iSEs 4c3VyfYU2Q45LTLR5xF9+duUL/TdqcOovXQ8M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LQ5Z2Zenpv9nSaiJFXGoYO07badiuvA3n/gU+a9Fx3zQOpyS6y6dE2bg2HucITRDGu Ka8hmtpfRA/Ugh4DYSgM/FeoUyNFW3SFWajkA6y8Ms7cgBfChE4rcYeS2YtW1KVCM4km sX+1HDiZiRnxsdjUZQfFbeBt6w9drnkM4/paU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.151.14 with SMTP id y14mr71393wfd.125.1255655693694; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <07ac01ca4dfc$685b4630$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
References: <4AD7387A.7060901@ericsson.com> <6e04e83a0910151433y2007a015ia77a407e702a3841@mail.gmail.com> <07ac01ca4dfc$685b4630$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:53 -0700
Message-ID: <6e04e83a0910151814g4b7e3818lc637ce774d172775@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri@tools.ietf.org, app-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri(Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers)to Proposed Standard]
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:14:55 -0000
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote: > > I requested review by uri-review on 30-JUL-2009, per your earlier > suggestion. However, we received no review comments from that > request, which was mentioned in the PROTO write-up for this > document. This is my only experience with uri-review; it was > easy and painless, because we received no comments. > > Somebody please shake the tree that is uri-review so that we can > progress this document. > > -d Howdy. It is being reviewed by URI-review, as per Magnus's request. I personally probably missed the earlier request because I was changing jobs right after the Stockholm IETF and had queued that kind of review for after the meeting. Sorry for my own delay. What I have suggested, though, is review by the *uri* mailing list, which is a larger group at uri@w3.org. This is not required, but can be done if there is reason. regards, Ted Hardie > >> regards, >> >> Ted Hardie >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Magnus Westerlund >> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > As responsible AD I would really appreciate an URI review of the two >> > proposed URI schemes. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Magnus Westerlund >> > >> > IETF Transport Area Director >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 >> > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 >> > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > The IESG has received a request from the Behavior Engineering for >> > Hindrance Avoidance WG (behave) to consider the following document: >> > >> > - 'Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform >> Resource Identifiers ' >> > <draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> > >> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, >> and solicits >> > final comments on this action. Please send substantive >> comments to the >> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-10-29. Exceptionally, >> > comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either >> case, please >> > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> > >> > The file can be obtained via >> > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-03.txt >> > >> > >> > IESG discussion can be tracked via >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie >> w_id&dTag=18080&rfc_flag=0 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Behave mailing list >> > Behave@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Uri-review mailing list >> > Uri-review@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > >
- [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Dan Wing
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Andrew Newton
- Re: [Uri-review] [Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-… Andrew Newton