Re: [Uri-review] The registration request for “cstr” URI scheme

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 May 2022 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB3FC159483 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G0G9dz9En4Ko for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F5DC14F727 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id z18so17856279iob.5 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Afy5QTjgoBIkZJCD5cN1ZcsIcXN1QD8wB9UYebh0ync=; b=l9n+4I2v2skDF/8FLDR+QfFMfdEs1NgsfaGlIObHtGT9v6LDDGB3YUQPss3V2I+MI6 AKqcKTzaSzylESB2R6zsUojfA0up2YigbMICuNojnt6wEM/4EB/GXA7+Z+fqyvcjXKJE cjZuVkD8iEZl6Kg8fhoJI4IWWQd5UkCPk2c+LqVfy/pal/8kIe8I1vfSfnUT40/wKWJC GLyIypaJih7RL/MdHb224T3oAdhOjwsaMmYeDDX1ytWkzR612t52qn2gH3flfg6fS/gP j7CUYO+H79a1kvto8RukiCNMMIDNp4tKA1G9Mx5gPSj1R16RhoGHeBldTF/VL6yfB8B8 dWdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Afy5QTjgoBIkZJCD5cN1ZcsIcXN1QD8wB9UYebh0ync=; b=g7/6ysQMTny6Sq4+KzmxgmNGh7P/qRQHXw4yrggVbqNGWnFRItoMhIEg1kiOiCzV+E Vs4kcsWmpkvXkS1MQHklsgIOIEb8gzQi8TvbHcgVjeZzqYjozsKg7o69PTDpf/MDxTcU 6QiPfcnTKKcPS8MPA+/1U795U43cXuXGaGmy47cwH0kb9pC98kOwd5RMNX6rz1srzz1s o7tTiobyu5WCMI1Z3Wc3T0NW25iCW8fCZvyQDRj85U9CTswBdi1R1oPFFDPBWOZq7Q++ +3AZ+oE5zfBokiyAVzMIBUvFfb+3iCPPgDHZGJc3D2OfhV5V5B/2z/1uc67Cfo1YiaDD xgHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JISa5AK1EampvRd+fJRdpUMx2VcFWJqWUquPPB0LqRtzR7bIo a/OUukallmHcoNZC7C8keUEX3tQU1vU3p97zAv/mnG64
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9r1iO1QDyDrWdTLMzs11xOfZ4kTettm4jlEUtqwU/adjTBT3H3hRmQAW9eyv+VyKQTO/CeHUjHiJsXQlDTXA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:27cc:b0:5f0:876e:126b with SMTP id l12-20020a05660227cc00b005f0876e126bmr8629903ios.129.1652173024646; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2022042617064765004922@cnic.cn> <CA+9kkMA4JZw6cBDUzJQsvgOfveKYkw8u3P1hm60_pDkfQP1MtQ@mail.gmail.com> <202205061436003998902@cnic.cn> <CA+9kkMBsewwjGHeVscb4A6grtX+tgehEi0=7oRQeTRr6V9WM4g@mail.gmail.com> <202205071605300619137@cnic.cn> <CA+9kkMCPOjo2a4KiL7-rPAvrkoWuMQNUU8xAwbC5NpPJzZ3-pQ@mail.gmail.com> <202205101613336308564@cnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202205101613336308564@cnic.cn>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:56:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMD5Rqg2Fnjg0AM9V53q47KasSiNjrbJ53XO6R6WkM40jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "wangshu@cnic.cn" <wangshu@cnic.cn>
Cc: uri-review <uri-review@ietf.org>, liujia <liujia@cnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003dd99b05dea482c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/YzShmSf4WXOd2GaYzFAtoIZPn6I>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] The registration request for “cstr” URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 08:57:12 -0000

Dear Wangshu,

Thank you for this additional detail in the specification.  I believe this
registration is ready to proceed.

best regards,

Ted Hardie

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 9:13 AM wangshu@cnic.cn <wangshu@cnic.cn> wrote:

> Dear Ted Hardie,
>
> Thank you for your comments. The internal identifier is defined by the
> user, including digit, alphabet and ASCII character "-"(octet 0x2D),
> "."(octet 0x2E), "_" (octet 0x5F), "~"(octet 0x7E). We have already updated
> the CSTR specification. *https://cstr.cn/doc/specification/*
> <https://cstr.cn/doc/specification/>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions about cstr.
>
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
> Best wishes.
>
> Shu
> ------------------------------
> wangshu@cnic.cn
>
>
> *发件人:* Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
> *发送时间:* 2022-05-08 17:46
> *收件人:* wangshu@cnic.cn
> *抄送:* uri-review <uri-review@ietf.org>; liujia <liujia@cnic.cn>
> *主题:* Re: Re: [Uri-review] The registration request for “cstr” URI scheme
> Dear Wang Shu,
>
> Thank you for the updates to the registration.  The only remaining issue
> is clarifying the set of characters which may be used in constructing an
> internal identifier.  One way to do that would be to specify that they are
> constructed from the RFC 3986 unreserved set:
>
>  unreserved  = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"
>
>
> If that is the case.  If it is not, or there are restrictions you wish to
> note, that would be appropriate to specify here.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ted Hardie
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 9:05 AM wangshu@cnic.cn <wangshu@cnic.cn> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ted Hardie and others,
>>
>> Thank you for all your comments, the application of cstr is in the
>> initial stage, so we are not sure all the security considerations at
>> the time of registration.
>>
>> We have already updated the CSTR specification. CSTR and the registration
>> agency code are separated by the ASCII character ":" (octet 0x3A), and the
>> rest of the parts are separated by the ASCII character "." (octet 0x2E).
>>
>> The "cstr" scheme is specified as follows:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Scheme name: cstr
>>
>>
>>
>> Status: Provisional
>>
>>
>>
>> Applications/protocols that use this scheme name:
>>
>> A "cstr" URI is used to express an identifier that is for common science
>> and technology resources.
>>
>> Applications that use this scheme name provide services for the
>> persistent identification, inluding citation, statistics and traceability
>> of science and technology resources.
>>
>>
>>
>> Security considerations:
>>
>>    The general security considerations from Section 7 of RFC 3986
>> apply, but no other security considerations have been identified at the
>> time of registration.
>>
>>
>>
>> Contact: Wang Shu (wangshu@cnic.cn)
>>
>>
>>
>> Change controllers:
>>
>>   - Wang Shu (wangshu@cnic.cn)
>>
>>   - Computer Network Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences
>>
>>
>>
>> References:
>>
>> [1] *https://www.cstr.cn/en/* <https://www.cstr.cn/en/>
>>
>> [2] *https://cstr.cn/doc/specification/*
>> <https://cstr.cn/doc/specification/>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any questions about cstr.
>>
>> Looking forward to your reply.
>>
>> Best wishes.
>>
>> Shu
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> wangshu@cnic.cn
>>
>