IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> Tue, 04 July 2006 11:38 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxjEf-000283-RO; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:38:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxjEe-00025y-HK for uri-review@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:38:32 -0400
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxjEd-0000Ao-8A for uri-review@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:38:32 -0400
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1381116ugc for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SAdRKWJn3n8c1DWR6qxQCGJZh24IwseQtTK46FuTU8+zjZxgZey6JddLHfHwbElDFsBNAS1D+ewvBRka+AttLKTT9siZfj5ExIlEOQykXo+hEj2b+LtvhxgTAT6rYAuaBMH3pPXfYO1uwFR7lOdaAuFtqIjDqjwiCIy37IOPtJY=
Received: by 10.78.156.6 with SMTP id d6mr1291309hue; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.15.17 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0607040438n48236776t4a840d3be956c210@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:38:30 -0400
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
In-Reply-To: <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E10315001972C61DF@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c70bc85d0607031733x2dece110mfa2e628db08598b6@mail.gmail.com> <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E10315001972C61DF@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4782e7ca8dc45474
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: "John Calhoon (LCA)" <John.Calhoon@microsoft.com>, TedHardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Jerry Dunietz <jerryd@windows.microsoft.com>, Gregg Brown <greggb@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

Andrey,

On 7/4/06, Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Ok. I see your point.
> To complete the picture - how your solution works for the packages residing in a database on a server? For instance a package at: http://www.example.org/foo/packages.asp?name=my.package

I'd suggest you publish a purely hierarchical URI like the ones I've
suggested, and then use URI rewriting to map it to URIs like that one
above (if that's what your database requires).  Obviously my solution
does rely on hierarchy.

Cheers,

Mark.

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email