Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Hi Daniel, 

I think I know what you're saying but I want to make sure so, when you say 'mandatory colon' do you mean for all URIs or for just http?

Tim

> On 05/23/2020 11:37 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I think I know what you're saying but I want to make sure so, when you say 'mandatory colon' do you mean for all URIs or for just http?
> 
> Tim
> > On May 23, 2020 at 7:31 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 22 May 2020 at 17:29, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
> > 
> > > The second draft of the 'drop' URI scheme is available and can be
> > > found here <
> > > " rel="noopener" target="_blank" data-mce-href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/>">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/). Thank
> > > you.
> > This doesn't seem to resolve any of the issues people have raised; it
> > still omits the mandatory colon after the scheme, and puts its main
> > content, used for resource resolution and retrieval, in a fragment
> > identifier, which is intended for client-specific post-processing
> > after a document is retrieved.
> > 
> > --
> > == Dan ==
> > Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
> > Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
> > Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Uri-review mailing list
> > Uri-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review