IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status

Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com> Wed, 23 February 2022 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37803A0949 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:48:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pnp-hcl.com header.b=iICCNxc2; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=pnp-hcl.com header.b=OZSoUfxi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MD9_LbLxJQAG for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.mail.cwp.pnp-hcl.com (smtp1.mail.cwp.pnp-hcl.com [3.226.151.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159ED3A08FF for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:48:01 -0800 (PST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1645645679-156ea7124c1b3450001-ROH5yb
Received: from mailhub1.domino.cwp.pnp-hcl.com (ip-10-134-103-34.ec2.internal [10.134.103.34]) by smtp1.mail.cwp.pnp-hcl.com with ESMTP id 9JrtQNrEKfCTEqgS (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:47:59 -0500 (EST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: dconmy@pnp-hcl.com
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.134.103.34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pnp-hcl.com; s=09302021; t=1645643549; bh=7eqvBUAW15XtBGxw4BU8dNU6nHsfZDHp2OSjtfSPJIo=; h=MIME-Version:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Date: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=iICCNxc2la66sLPKR711YzlqmfhFlThr2utPp0jLjIJJ8Us2oqwu0oCBIX/4FBoDD cQxtjOn7QvPMQOVgV1Kk78ciMs7j1tMN339OqoWLJdqHiW7Z5sB0XslAsu7Baa1u3A lHM57O5N8bzN/RLrsVoTgE87HoTe6VeQwlnwgwm8vi/SLRYCJDxd1ailsGX16OLB97 k5FcOow8h1UsH7f9tLXwQ3RUkqIIZzEJ5ChM4iabiI/ABHGTyIuriETYNpfnaqWleI Viu/iwHDVTS5Hu7XoUq5poc14xXfsmgcSdDqQcZCAoUQFJAmrMGuUdPWCiqANQcTy7 apqwOVDXxBV1A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pnp-hcl.com; s=ed10122021; t=1645643549; bh=7eqvBUAW15XtBGxw4BU8dNU6nHsfZDHp2OSjtfSPJIo=; h=MIME-Version:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Date: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=OZSoUfxiSGyscmpmXuqh4TsCmK9VT3H0Rlg0uJ+/qn6P1u+o2LATzQarKPIr95sDH eCCN+/rhtlYFGX7Pg2ADw==
Sensitivity:
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CE37A3D3-A96E-4A5C-AF77-47D503E2720C@tzi.org>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status
References: <CE37A3D3-A96E-4A5C-AF77-47D503E2720C@tzi.org>, <OF9EA0B359.6CAFEE0E-ON002587F0.006B73B3-002587F0.006BDE9B@pnp-hcl.com>
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
From: Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>
To: cabo@tzi.org
Cc: Robert S Sielken <rsielken@pnp-hcl.com>, Scott Vrusho <scott_vrusho@pnp-hcl.com>, uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:47:58 -0500
Message-ID: <OF79B34656.9E6BBC13-ON852587F2.006C7CB9-852587F2.006CC336@pnp-hcl.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Domino Web Server Build V1202_02182022 February 18, 2022
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by http on Ella/PNPHCL(Build V1202_02182022|February 18, 2022) at 02/23/2022 02:47:58 PM, Serialize complete at 02/23/2022 02:47:58 PM, Serialize by Router on Mailhub1/PNPHCL(Release 12.0.1|November 22, 2021) at 02/23/2022 02:12:28 PM
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Barracuda-Connect: ip-10-134-103-34.ec2.internal[10.134.103.34]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1645645679
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
X-Barracuda-URL: https://3.226.151.152:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at pnp-hcl.com
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 2022
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.96236 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/aGXzvdM_9TZZvS1VItE-wXD_QM4>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 19:48:07 -0000

IBM Lotus Notes is a predecessor client version to HCL Notes which can be found in the informative reference, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCL_Domino" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCL_Domino.   The product sale to HCL was finalized in 2019.  

I have submitted the draft to here, apologies for not following the correct process.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dconmy-notes-uri-scheme/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dconmy-notes-uri-scheme/
 
----- Original message -----
From: "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org>
To: "Doug Conmy" <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, "Scott Vrusho" <scott_vrusho@pnp-hcl.com>, "Robert S Sielken" <rsielken@pnp-hcl.com>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status
Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2022 11:21 AM
 
On 2022-02-21, at 20:38, Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com> wrote:
>
> The scheme is currently provisional:   https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes

What is IBM Lotus Notes?  Do you have a reference for that?
I can’t find anything that would indicate this exists any more.

> As I understand it, XML is the preferred format and has been included.

I can’t parse this — where is that XML?

Grüße, Carsten
 
 

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email