Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Wed, 17 June 2020 01:12 UTC
Return-Path: <dan@tobias.name>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329C83A0CE2 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RJ7mk-2UhJJo for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46F43A0CE1 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mail@dan.tobias.name
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8107E0C7A for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-7-20.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.7.20]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 765437E100D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mail@dan.tobias.name
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:12:02 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|mail@dan.tobias.name
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Befitting-Stop: 6c9936a346b7af27_1592356322693_1170013983
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1592356322693:2754780432
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1592356322693
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CA07F60F for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (c-73-245-214-115.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [73.245.214.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@dan.tobias.name) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B67327F606 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a22
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:12:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5EE96DE0.18138.4499EB9@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <1192631250.937545.1592251697716@email.ionos.com>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>, <4CEF6E3B-6116-4CDB-B660-16554A9638B5@mac.com>, <1192631250.937545.1592251697716@email.ionos.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.73.639)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-description: Mail message body
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudejuddggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfffggfukfgjfhfotgfgsehtsfertdfftddunecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrnhhivghlucftrdcuvfhosghirghsfdcuoegurghnsehtohgsihgrshdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeehieduheehffdutdejtdevhedvvdefgedvgeekueelffdtudduffeivdegtdenucffohhmrghinhepuggrnhdrihhnfhhonecukfhppeejfedrvdeghedrvddugedrudduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegluddtrddtrddtrddvngdpihhnvghtpeejfedrvdeghedrvddugedrudduhedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthhepfdffrghnihgvlhcutfdrucfvohgsihgrshdfuceouggrnhesthhosghirghsrdhnrghmvgeqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnhesthhosghirghsrdhnrghmvgdpnhhrtghpthhtohepuhhrihdqrhgvvhhivgifsehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/b18vuZWbB5sNh4a-aHA14MEIYPk>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:12:05 -0000
On 15 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote: > From what I gather from the feedback, the parsers wont parse it > correctly. Is that so bad? I mean, if my idea only work sometimes, > or somewheres, is that bad for everyone, or just bad for me? Pretty much just you. You'll never get such a nonstandard scheme registered, but nobody can force you not to implement it anyway in whatever software or hardware you create, but you're unlikely to get anybody else to use it and other systems won't be able to interoperate with it. -- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
- [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Thomas Fruin
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney