IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)

DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <datapacrat@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A7A21F9FB7 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-EzMNdReYBS for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9819521F9FB4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k10so858670wiv.7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VzsIS64lmHra9SaFjKhCOuMb1rOJwnoJNXcqLgehbmM=; b=LBuy4DfYyAV/cs7pieNH37+SDrsAbjzwcjV/BncVsUl3pHRBkpszklGvxVfc9SzL52 yPIRhH5Kv0pbyzz+pEPzC/YCgxqyHYpO+7R7bmRxCwqmJztcuOS7RmEZPHxBBeJiRA2S 5T8O1eXLQF+00t7ApxNqQamrn3ikzXC14MHVIZYi+W1cYZz5LvuCoFNeKZ8AtVjdD6kH 31KoessNSN0W5jCyXY4Qih4WBtjz8V2S0HeHTk0Qg1BintWs3oB0YJ3Tx15JMAxp3t5u ceFIEywtOfS0RyXeqAw6QIqolw3o57IOau+l3EIX0pt8fkeemMr7BPYMJunXExcTcGhT ueBw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.36.36 with SMTP id n4mr2241240wij.0.1371835126722; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.243.193 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB5WduCz4nRSeMUVKnjmUNEDxzRB54khCiU2-1sqCYr1TKLSFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB5WduCMF+HMyHPFU1bJkOcbzpyAM063XvCM-uDn2zGAoZkFEg@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3471E4101A@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CAB5WduCz4nRSeMUVKnjmUNEDxzRB54khCiU2-1sqCYr1TKLSFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:18:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB5WduAmmMkwBs5fU4Nzz1S8mTqn_oBp+7j0APSOib51OVSdTA@mail.gmail.com>
From: DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:18:49 -0000

It's been about a week, and I haven't got any significant feedback on
nym, either positive or negative. So, unless some reason crops up to
do otherwise, I'll probably work on working through the RFC 4395
process whenever I have some spare time to do so; and since there
doesn't seem to be any rush, I'll take the time to do the best job I
can at every step.

(For example, I'm now going to consult with some experts about
calibrating the example levels of decibans.)



Thank you for your time,
--
DataPacRat
"Then again, I could be wrong."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email