Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status

You might want to mention that % should be escaped as %25?

I'm curious as to why on earth this is happening in 2022, I haven't
encountered a Notes instance in years…

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:44 AM Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com> wrote:

> The submission has been submitted as an IETF draft.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dconmy-notes-uri-scheme/
>
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: "Graham Klyne" <gklyne@gmail.com>
> To: "Doug Conmy" <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>, uri-review@ietf.org
> Cc: "Scott Vrusho" <scott_vrusho@pnp-hcl.com>, "Robert S Sielken" <
> rsielken@pnp-hcl.com>
> Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per
> RFC7595 for permanent status
> Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2022 7:36 AM
>
> What are you asking to be reviewed?  I can't see any documentation.
>
> An XML attachment isn't helpful for reviewing purposes, and I can't find
> any
> similarly-named published IETF draft.
>
> I suggest that publication as an IETF draft and providing a link here would
> facilitate helpful reviews.
>
> #g
>
>
>
> On 21/02/2022 19:38, Doug Conmy wrote:
> > The scheme is currently provisional:
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes
> > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes>
> > As I understand it, XML is the preferred format and has been included.
> > Thank you for your time and consideration.
> > Doug Conmy
> > HCL Software
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Uri-review mailing list
> > Uri-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>