[Uri-review] Re: [art] Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dale,

> The *Abstract* of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server says
> 
>    The 'ietf-uri' module defines a YANG 'grouping' for the URI described in
>    Section 3 of RFC 3986.
> 
> So the Yang module MUST support all of the URI formats of section 3 of
> RFC 3986.
> 
> If you want to limit the representable universe to "URI schemes that we
> think will be useful to applications that use Yang", you need to make
> that restriction explicit in the definition of what you are trying to
> do.

True, the original intent was to be 1-1 with RFC 3986.  But since this discussion has concluded that is not possible, we're now looking to see what structured format is possible, and then the text in the I-D will be updated to match.


Thanks,
Kent