IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Sun, 24 May 2020 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9143A0C7D for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2tUwCSK0doF for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDCA13A0C7B for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.72.49]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MA82J-1jjkvo0mtN-00BKRj; Sun, 24 May 2020 20:25:45 +0200
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 14:25:45 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>, uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1310141163.159340.1590344745080@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <94368b41-c15b-da2c-421d-fdd9300be6e9@dret.net>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com> <5EC9B257.31362.CC5E003@dan.tobias.name> <1783049000.100771.1590323508943@email.ionos.com> <5ECA8A94.23977.101292FE@dan.tobias.name> <1426881880.158099.1590335585858@email.ionos.com> <94368b41-c15b-da2c-421d-fdd9300be6e9@dret.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev31
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:XIwPqh+pheZ2ne74zY+VB9/o+bbVud+5t2RxebxxrhhY6IGqdE1 6deDl3Gnj3Lskh4GDyl5fhe3gGNBkw4KW9BlDJJMepyyYqdR6/CG86/d0UJtZ1KPDheIQXb n1CbPFf8qXdxLADR1biwSy1OV6BeIAATvSPWt1ief2Mmo7VSpWsfbbz0fQdteSzOc3uck2q RWbW2dKn1uioO7ge0Wv6Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:D4pFJ5L7g+k=:tTBMnfKHWix+8KJUsDj/V7 /RtALAmk3F+lttT0o1eeRrOUwOmzjxDcZRQTwnqhduaTOsz3mNnoCFc71g1g3ZrfYrw2jxttj Fz15mk2uPYtXpr5H8aP8R4hAAk+YYHLHNP5ps/Ra76KA69IP4oaBrYSKVmWh59NbvtWawOsam FAqQF+YfmW5gu6FaoNUkrihFvxyX0eYdXN6Pxyic0ruaBIhH3HT75OmW3MpcCXEaSmMI7HPwx m+hwF1t10wkO2irUd8ZkeLbqhuqhCI6NhB6dzKMoSPkLhHbRF0NpskPt8vgeOEf8F9o0fJ3HH SXqzzK0WB+5lp1sIOysBX7T4VtpCI0vEygw3yXknFqsuDm8avtCGnQmfKLuEUssyp2/4lVKqp TLxpLMAn0N1xIqG8ovRsvmMWTAYIT5xuIFyL+/nzjAQU6ipqyBOh2BUPzVySbGrj3iUvtdFRA D9twjgatrwZ6/Hc8QbC7t7E6KosWuB5F3QlZJPVOvAaxAbm1ucwgsc3tiA9vUyHByrSRrghrn I4WiTDCUczzRg7x3jD78VlsetVbWI/e3Ed/ii4A0XnaUv2inn1PovC5eFiU84doDyYgjHKFQF RFalMQcL29ppHRcQsP2UV6iNxD++avjQRMCuci32ROWnJKuLlpr0FJCHmNoBPFry8PlOtmNLa 6pRQYaHElviS7LnC32s54oYAdpvfUudn7ULh5/i2ZarvKRLh/+bfu3SvEJTagoAlyP8Lo75v3 HEv8HqBHMcBkrau+e9In2XgjR1KyaJgrchQZjr5CS0HfzQjXZsapHgnJ3SfE9p0uvrLOLBfSU fEsJyJAXf52krqipaIvlEq4kySypnUhPtbmIL6QbLl1qtw602t515Sd2RU8MtKEvIKaHDN2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/eBRwKX4wX4dy8PtiF3tjuGb9bvA>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 18:26:31 -0000

Hi Erik, 

Thank you, I will have another look at my reference to section 3.   
Would you agree that in "https://ietf.org" the colon is not part of the hier-part? 
On May 24, 2020 at 12:02 PM Erik Wilde < erik.wilde@dret.net> wrote:


hey tim.

On 2020-05-24 17:53, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
Yes, I agree and understand that the same way as you.   But when the "#"
leaves the client it is not leaving as a fragment,
what people are telling you is that "#" and anything following it never
leaves the client, by definition.

it is leaving as a
way to separate the URI components, <scheme> and <path> or for http it
would be separating <scheme> and <authority>.  It is this that makes me
believe that even if the colon is required for http resolution, it is
not necessarily required for all URI.
this discussion could be more productive if you had a brief look at the
specs you're depending on. the very first rule shown in

URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

each URI is defined like this and must have a colon.

cheers,

dret.

--
erik wilde | mailto: erik.wilde@dret.net |
| http://dret.net/netdret" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://dret.net/netdret |
| http://twitter.com/dret" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/dret |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email