Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI scheme, draft 01
Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Fri, 13 April 2018 20:34 UTC
Return-Path: <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F43129BBF for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=adobe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSDmRTTTqae0 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0089.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EF7127978 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adobe.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=AsR2QseaLDO02xUelIZq0gdrL3OeLM7A7EODTPjurIw=; b=wI+zAJxhaMSYZbgWixkbK03/Ui55RDn1lehSrksh87BZYLyfsJogFV73OpJji2ycBOokaGW85n3w5zYBxcIXuIBzAmvjiVQOVIA10iSluPM5f8+FkbuH8usbpu0I+opckUQJgvnyI6UHNhuVnApkr2d9v7hT6Z5x6SeQnknhpiI=
Received: from DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.167.105.155) by DM5PR0201MB3432.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.167.105.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.675.14; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:34:25 +0000
Received: from DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d16e:f50f:9c0c:8b1d]) by DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d16e:f50f:9c0c:8b1d%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0675.012; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:34:25 +0000
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: Florian Dold <florian.dold@inria.fr>
CC: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI scheme, draft 01
Thread-Index: AQHT0R2D17Lfb5Yg30qFXmOB4tRl6qP7L8QAgAA8d4CAAFAvMIAAJyOAgAI4+vCAAAxJ+4AALYsAgADOIkA=
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:34:25 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR0201MB3461CC2BE3911A6C4BE60E10C3B30@DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <496f8300-4df8-2ca9-751b-e7b481203175@inria.fr> <5ACDBCFE.4030706@ninebynine.org> <1257488c-6d8a-a915-57e7-27f035aee991@inria.fr> <DM5PR0201MB346194A8C9D866A6CD4B49BEC3BD0@DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <fd1dcfd1-2855-446f-a46c-5c441e221b87@inria.fr> <DM5PR0201MB3461594B753258669489BC5CC3B30@DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DM5PR0201MB3461EDB8DC681DFE3C106F4AC3B30@DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <77192bd3-a57a-2585-6c91-d03ee7676136@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <77192bd3-a57a-2585-6c91-d03ee7676136@inria.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=masinter@adobe.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.6.174.39]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR0201MB3432; 7:Cw2lo9Y7txWC1DCtLO0Lj1MnTMyj5KDA5rxDHW6xBVaInyeaYP02V274xDxsUz8DfdjmPxQIyLOjLGsUAhmbJJ1WnzyAnVOUE1XDzdgCBz1bVNbJ2GohUOQkFXRa4w5GJ/+48wHUOsEOJfpUkD/JLWLLfDrVzBG1m1dJIzdTmka4nC/u9akpyjWWDxXa1TzlTptBNt8mV6ar114GjR1ph6KyvK9KnhMew/7qrlURDjsrft8+EJ3hPuI7hpZULnKg
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR0201MB3432;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR0201MB3432:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR0201MB34320F8DAB01488F711AD921C3B30@DM5PR0201MB3432.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(61425038)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231232)(944501327)(52105095)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR0201MB3432; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR0201MB3432;
x-forefront-prvs: 0641678E68
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(39380400002)(189003)(199004)(99286004)(26005)(5250100002)(76176011)(59450400001)(6506007)(3846002)(6116002)(186003)(2900100001)(66066001)(68736007)(105586002)(86362001)(4326008)(305945005)(446003)(316002)(11346002)(14454004)(6246003)(10090500001)(102836004)(7696005)(478600001)(6306002)(81166006)(5660300001)(6436002)(8990500004)(33656002)(9686003)(53936002)(6916009)(8936002)(81156014)(476003)(97736004)(55016002)(8676002)(486006)(93886005)(3660700001)(7736002)(229853002)(3280700002)(966005)(106356001)(2906002)(74316002)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR0201MB3432; H:DM5PR0201MB3461.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5hJJe8EKMycKkn1A03pUAFvs0LtsxyQKXTyzlRl6C54qOqaohaMv6+Qf4dmAAXut5A6jV/gCwPho+p8rnfrbtd9NJD6xVTSMsL4ZaocPmq77J/a6LtSv9y7oQGy22H7Hb1KPDptcinAEpKj/L/ZLhuMNe4C6er4qwQahs79ffugnFclsae3EaJW1SLS6oNIn
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 259fc736-7626-4291-bd8c-08d5a17df2a3
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 259fc736-7626-4291-bd8c-08d5a17df2a3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Apr 2018 20:34:25.5188 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR0201MB3432
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/ezaKt7LggwBx0iCFt6Oi5JsMSMo>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI scheme, draft 01
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:34:29 -0000
On // and /: RFC 7595 section 3.2: Schemes that are not intended for use with relative URIs SHOULD avoid use of the forward slash "/" character in order to avoid unintended processing, such as resolution of "." and ".." (dot segments). Schemes SHOULD avoid improper use of "//". The use of double slashes in the first part of a URI is not a stylistic indicator that what follows is a URI: double slashes are intended for use ONLY when the syntax of the <scheme-specific-part> contains a hierarchical structure. In URIs from such schemes, the use of double slashes indicates that what follows is the top hierarchical element for a naming authority (Section 3.2 of RFC 3986 has more details). Schemes that do not contain a conformant hierarchical structure in their <scheme-specific-part> SHOULD NOT use double slashes following the "<scheme>:" string. RFC 7595 Section 3.3 While URIs might or might not be defined as locators in practice, a scheme definition itself MUST be clear as to how it is expected to function. Schemes that are not intended to be used as locators SHOULD describe how the resource identified can be determined or accessed by software that obtains a URI of that scheme. My point in citing https://www.thepaypers.com/cross-border-ecommerce was to note that if you DID want to use a banking payment processor, there isn't sufficient clarity as to how it is expected to function.
- [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI scheme,… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Adrian Hope-Bailie
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for payto URI sch… Florian Dold