Re: [Uri-review] posix
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 30 March 2020 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45D43A1550 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BI8F0RaPJw-O for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4043A1544 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0151.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0151.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48rpCD6963zyt0; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <293287663.426810.1585596955546@email.ionos.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:12:40 +0200
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 607302760.221436-2632f8a90a477cc1b8f96452121817fd
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A0E8311B-2E7A-4175-A467-89443C475A06@tzi.org>
References: <293287663.426810.1585596955546@email.ionos.com>
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/hxSB0bEgBYxyMm8uxXBmnpng8lI>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] posix
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:12:47 -0000
On 2020-03-30, at 21:35, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote: > > Does anyone have a copy of POSIX 1003.2 section 2.8? Hi Timothy, No idea what this has to do with URI-Review. I’m not sure you actually want a historical reference; a current one would be: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html If you really are interested in 1992: https://standards.ieee.org/standard/1003_2-1992.html My IEEE-fu is not sufficient to extract a document from that page. Grüße, Carsten
- [Uri-review] posix Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] posix Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Uri-review] posix Timothy Mcsweeney