Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme

Kang Su Gatlin <kagatlin@microsoft.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kagatlin@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0CD21F9A61 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NfhyAeWC9Kew for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0208.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BEA21F9A5B for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BL2FFO11FD026.protection.gbl (10.173.161.201) by BL2FFO11HUB039.protection.gbl (10.173.160.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.707.0; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:02:54 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD026.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.707.0 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:02:54 +0000
Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.112) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.136.1; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:02:45 +0000
Received: from mail219-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.240) by TX2EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.9.40.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:22 +0000
Received: from mail219-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail219-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6C17401C7 for <uri-review@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -19
X-BigFish: PS-19(zz98dI9371Ic89bh542I1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1033IL17326ah1954cbh8275bh8275dh1cd15eiz31h2a8h668h839h947hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh17ej9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail219-tx2: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=kagatlin@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB604; H:BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en;
Received: from mail219-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail219-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1370538019893112_9914; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.237]) by mail219-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F073A0090; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by TX2EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (10.9.99.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:16 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.109.38) by BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.311.1; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:15 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.109.38) by BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.109.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.698.13; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:14 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.88]) by BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.14]) with mapi id 15.00.0698.010; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:14 +0000
From: Kang Su Gatlin <kagatlin@microsoft.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme
Thread-Index: Ac5iQYRv8oAAuk4BRPi0uygO+nh+RwAQ5GUAABRpExA=
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:00:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4e73aea5ad544253acea4c8ba27d984e@BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <45bdda3798ba439aa8d672381402755e@CH1PR03MB610.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <93d0r89ep0k6p9kmpo5v77v4lqmjj2evq4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <93d0r89ep0k6p9kmpo5v77v4lqmjj2evq4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:77:3:55c2:2b3e:2540:bf79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%GMX.NET$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51704005)(13464003)(199002)(24454002)(189002)(377454002)(49866001)(76576001)(47446002)(47776003)(47976001)(74502001)(76796001)(74316001)(63696002)(80022001)(74366001)(69226001)(74662001)(31966008)(50986001)(76786001)(54316002)(20776003)(44976003)(81542001)(76482001)(79102001)(46102001)(51856001)(6806003)(47736001)(65816001)(33646001)(16676001)(15202345002)(74706001)(59766001)(56776001)(23756003)(53806001)(77982001)(74876001)(4396001)(81342001)(50466002)(54356001)(56816003)(16601075002)(77096001)(24736002)(3826001)(18886065002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB039; H:TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; CLIP:131.107.125.37; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 086943A159
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:03:18 -0000

Hi Bjoern, answers inline.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:12 AM
To: Kang Su Gatlin
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme

* Kang Su Gatlin wrote:
>Hello, I am requesting review for the following URI scheme:
>
>   Resource Identifier (RI) Scheme name:
>      ms-settings-power
>   Status:
>      provisional
>   Scheme syntax:
>      ms-settings-power

It is not really possible to craft a `ms-settings-power` URI based on this information, not other than `ms-settings-power:` at least.

[KSG] There is no additional syntax (consider the trailing colon added).  This will launch the battery saver setting application on Windows Phone via:

Windows.System.Launcher.LaunchUriAsync("ms-settings-power:");

>   Security considerations:
>      None

"None" does not make clear whether there genuinely are no issues to consider or if simply no thought has been spent on the matter.

[KSG] In this case none means that we believe there are no issues to consider.

>   References:
>      
> http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/how-to/wp8/basics/battery-making-it-
> last

A requirement for provisional registration is "If no permanent, citable specification for the URI scheme definition is included, credible reasons for not providing it should be given." The document above does not seem to even mention the scheme.

[KSG] I think this is now answered above in the syntax section.  Let me know if you believe otherwise.

--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/