Re: [Uri-review] 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 26 January 2012 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C99D11E8097 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cq5wbvz8lebC for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A23211E8096 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24D540058; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:16:38 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F20C34A.4030001@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:06:50 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <00c301ccd880$3e701c90$bb5055b0$@acm.org> <4F1CB6F7.8070100@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4F1CB6F7.8070100@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration)
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:06:53 -0000

On 1/22/12 6:25 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2012/01/22 6:04, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10
> 
>> This has been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet Draft.
>>
>> I was asked at least for something more stable, and I want to take this
>>
>> off my queue.
> 
>> The URI scheme registry doesn't have an 'experimental' section, so I
>> think
>> these should be noted as 'provisional'.
> 
> My understanding is that they should be registered as provisional
> already at the moment an ID is submitted. For an experimental RFC, I
> think either provisional or permanent would be okay.
> 
> In any case, please move forward with this towards RFC.

I could still sponsor this during my time on the IESG, but I would need
a document shepherd, as well as a PROTO writeup in the next week. That
might be too tight a deadline.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/