Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> Fri, 09 October 2009 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8501D28C1D3 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.028
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.358, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7snn7jzMBSX for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shark.2a.pl (shark.2a.pl [195.117.102.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F19B28C1C3 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020E12A6D6E; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:51:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at 2a.pl
Received: from shark.2a.pl ([195.117.102.3]) by av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5YJN-J4bXPq; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from POCZTOWIEC (unknown [10.8.1.26]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D5472A6D19; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
To: 'Steve Suehring' <suehring@braingia.org>, uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <BAAAC48036DE4C1A96E6AB1D677D87C2@POCZTOWIEC>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Thread-Index: AcpJB09ytJqvQ6LWSoy3fWmM/2ElwQAAK3YQ
In-Reply-To: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:05 -0000

  1. [4.4] Outdated internal references: The parameters are not described in
section 4.1.
  2. [4.4] The syntax does not forbid having a nonempty path component but a
semantic for one is not described.
  3. [5.1] I would rather have 
ssh://user@host.example.com?fingerprint=ssh-dss-c1-b1-30-29-d7-b8-de-6c-97-7
7-10-d7-46-41-63-87
for obvious reasons.
Please consider
Chris