IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"

Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> Tue, 21 December 2021 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF43A10D3 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=commercebyte.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PI9ue1maFzyT for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ocean1.commercebyte.com (ocean1.commercebyte.com [104.131.120.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F5D3A10D0 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:46:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=commercebyte.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=1qBgkp8HYbLESvI2K933KrHiHbTAfzBEUCyIJ1l0PUM=; b=DfhCkqnlF4nK+PmSwYgiwOeOnncwZPrzcocSjlIN+NQeAnuzp/vnLtuUku/iimxMYsHdw5UtdcBrR76FaQWzxuJSvCDSoHbhT1YXesQ/q+4QzQ6cywnAsgNPzFXZiu3pnJBqOdR1GDtevpCocez4Q/l8p4LG50w5e53vYOM2PNI=;
Received: from [172.58.129.178] (port=59796 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by ocean1.commercebyte.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>) id 1mzhL3-0006VK-4f; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:46:05 -0500
Received: from [2604:a880:400:d0::1ba9:8001]:7120 (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by [2607:fb90:9087:7ef5:19b:5bf5:1d44:22c2]:40876 (localhost) with VESmail ESMTP Proxy 1.58 (encrypt=FALSE mode=FALLBACK); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:46:04 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:45:55 -0500
From: Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>
To: Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com>, Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <278362123.48801.1640100776158@email.ionos.com>
References: <1174886867.22172.1640093277007@email.ionos.com> <F42C6667-6AF1-4382-941A-DE16D8C15428@commercebyte.com> <1693619625.16369.1640095542307@email.ionos.com> <213EECD8-8AD3-4723-9335-9B256146ABDC@commercebyte.com> <1523568480.20322.1640097911866@email.ionos.com> <69292463-950E-4379-81B0-CD4887B8E7C0@commercebyte.com> <28205083.56495.1640099497609@email.ionos.com> <0DF65AF6-6530-4949-A21D-45E00C6960A6@commercebyte.com> <278362123.48801.1640100776158@email.ionos.com>
Message-ID: <F9B6AA77-2627-4C25-AFDF-2FC4F7990D01@commercebyte.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----2BAM83PGMXHZ0Y8HX4G0C1NYIMCGPT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ocean1.commercebyte.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - commercebyte.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ocean1.commercebyte.com: authenticated_id: jz@nixob.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/n5lrtiAHIk0h87gXQfRnf-oDMzA>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:46:12 -0000

There are violations like stripped percent encoding while the uri is still unambiguously interpretable, and then there are violations of the uri concept altogether.
And, I removed any allowances for stripped percent encoding in the later revision.

On December 21, 2021 10:32:56 AM EST, Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com> wrote:
>Ata boy Jim! Thats what I wanted to here. "A gross violation."
>Although it strange to hear it coming from the guy who's specification explicitly states
>
>"I purposely specified some permitted violations of URI syntax" 
>
>But whatever.  Make it up as you go along, right Jim!  
>
>
>
>
>> On 12/21/2021 10:15 AM Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> No, I believe it's a gross violation of the RFC to use the scheme name without ':'
>> 
>> 
>> On December 21, 2021 10:11:37 AM EST, Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> > > On 12/21/2021 10:04 AM Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> wrote:
>> > > I just wanted to explicitly state that the separator characters, when unescaped, should never be treated as a part of improperly encoded path.
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > So you won't ever use "ves#" instead of "ves:" right?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email