IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uri-review] Re: [art] Re: Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG

worley@ariadne.com Fri, 05 December 2025 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dale.worley@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: uri-review@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA3A960F1DD for <uri-review@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.017, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLumE0bFA64P for <uri-review@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-c2p-570919.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-c2p-570919.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd00:56::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFA7960F1D4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-c2p-555662.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.18.235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resqmta-c2p-570919.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPS id RXfpvhPN38YadRYMXvCosG; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:08:53 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20211018a; t=1764950933; bh=S+te2eFbjLcLPpNwUjubFCIuRy0tW8YNBH2pZuu6fgo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=beKYnHHL/Ioqp2XWb4/rbpSok1hPlA7403Pk76TpZ98CBoQZ4lrcFlgTwuGGyINoM GIDYKAGfKW7ZB5r6ZbIOPBpVWtZv/dw4vnCNqsf1lY11XB9skquwP4bd4FLdCEyO72 3truNH41JmlbMc0PKdJ2cHOOhfVy7TwIirTV8wytk7DQMcYr3qcHrU8F2d0bn+vom+ NWR/SBe+BkeiYEQlMMGjNkR6aIHsofgFm36DB8+o/42567SpRdSEHKPnjORhurFeJV 1UDyrgPJZl+5AoUaa4I4QrI1ZSAPHffPAB/NfSmsLdcWzvCyfaIW97LWG6EYoHiJqG drzChFJt1Ipfg==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:197:580:b5c0::b07d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resomta-c2p-555662.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id RYMTv33dBqqjsRYMUv1MdJ; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:08:51 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 5B5G8nLn2044354 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:08:49 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 5B5G8mhd2044351; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:08:48 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to Dale.Worley@comcast.net using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iv6EfX=zGbAG+S11X4Qke=2X3ju3CntHPZMHW3CMv8voQ@mail.gmail.com> (tbray@textuality.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:08:48 -0500
Message-ID: <878qfgap2n.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfISlmlwjdTVhOPP4Nb+4lljRCCq5HtySPCzrlms8sDSu0UBeVuUQ8aHhdOqEPALT6zAQal9bJzY3oVTgst7Q5EvZN+epeZGL3dExmAwmylBWyfApDmjP SBArj86nfE9iuOIRkORjiugQvMAT23CzC8kY2yTkpge4fh71qDo1xSboK7D7QT/gYPrkUWcnPbr72IkzWbzC8AoofqgUGXx7KU6mZ6bkLqpihS48YuUAkMi9 eU+HRT91LaXfgy0Z9lNY/BZR4+7UUW2QlkaYSoVDZRe+kzhzrNVJwCZlGMwrQD6TYBoQkgS+W90LmPnrOvMSPpP/5bfkhJEKZNk/wk3zkldW6uyXUYGOh25q lBGCtWtXjIq+XiMID+/bw0mXfv/CdrjqCXzYOxNcG2X0fsZPl4dn9rIH+QqSHxaQ+znZDteP
Message-ID-Hash: ORX4SSHQ3L6J6VG3T3T4YMLDRZFKX5OQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: ORX4SSHQ3L6J6VG3T3T4YMLDRZFKX5OQ
X-MailFrom: dale.worley@comcast.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-uri-review.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: kent+ietf@watsen.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com, ietfa@btconnect.com, art@ietf.org, uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org, mt@lowentropy.net
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Uri-review] Re: [art] Re: Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/ogxxx9D4BXMaPGXyv0bIpQV2cpg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:uri-review-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:uri-review-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:uri-review-leave@ietf.org>

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> writes:
> I guess specifying a minimum list of URI schemes is OK, but having a
> maximum, i.e. limiting the allowed schemes, is likely not a good idea
> because new ones come along and occasionally are useful.

Let me support this vigorously.

The *Abstract* of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server says

    The 'ietf-uri' module defines a YANG 'grouping' for the URI described in
    Section 3 of RFC 3986.

So the Yang module MUST support all of the URI formats of section 3 of
RFC 3986.

If you want to limit the representable universe to "URI schemes that we
think will be useful to applications that use Yang", you need to make
that restriction explicit in the definition of what you are trying to
do.

Dale

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status