Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Thu, 21 May 2020 03:36 UTC
Return-Path: <dan@tobias.name>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770B13A0A68
for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9XYj5f6d-d30 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 20 May 2020 20:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-fallback-a1.dreamhost.com
(pdx1-sub0-mail-fallback-a1.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.138])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB4C3A0A43
for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [10.35.42.197])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pdx1-sub0-mail-fallback-a1.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
520F027791C; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5FE7E0BE;
Wed, 20 May 2020 20:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (c-73-245-214-115.hsd1.fl.comcast.net
[73.245.214.115])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: mail@dan.tobias.name)
by pdx1-sub0-mail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E0A67F673;
Wed, 20 May 2020 20:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a35
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 23:34:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <122709156.27676.1590010716156@email.ionos.com>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>,
<ead89691-e0a4-e1dc-4d79-fbe65722731b@it.aoyama.ac.jp>,
<122709156.27676.1590010716156@email.ionos.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.73.639)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Content-description: Mail message body
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddutddgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfffggfukfgjfhfotgfgsehtsfertdfftddunecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrnhhivghlucftrdcuvfhosghirghsfdcuoegurghnsehtohgsihgrshdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeilefhheejteeifffgvedutdekjeegtdetffeuhffffeffleehvdehudffhfdvkeenucffohhmrghinhepshhouhhpshguvghlihdrtghomhdpuggrnhdrihhnfhhonecukfhppeejfedrvdeghedrvddugedrudduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegluddtrddtrddtrddvngdpihhnvghtpeejfedrvdeghedrvddugedrudduhedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthhepfdffrghnihgvlhcutfdrucfvohgsihgrshdfuceouggrnhesthhosghirghsrdhnrghmvgeqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnhesthhosghirghsrdhnrghmvgdpnhhrtghpthhtohepuhhrihdqrhgvvhhivgifsehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/ql2CVdtFB64-KcOZ022UaaqhmL0>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>,
<mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>,
<mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 03:36:05 -0000
On 20 May 2020 at 17:38, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
> I followed your instructions and I could not recreate what you wanted
> me to see. Here are the two pages I made:
>
> <http://www.soupsdeli.com/base.html>
> <http://www.soupsdeli.com/drop>
>
> Perhaps it had something to do with the hosting provider?? I'm not
> sure what's wrong here.
This is the content of your first page:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head><meta charset="us-ascii">
<title>test link</title>
</head>
<body>
<div> <h2><a href='http://drop#fg34htx' target="_blank"
rel="noopener">Link to drop URI</a></div>
</body>
</html>
As you can see, the "href" value doesn't have "drop#fg34htx" by
itself as requested; it has a "http://" before it. This transforms it
into a http URI with "drop" as its domain, which my browser
"helpfully" converts into a link to drop.com. It would presumably
then go to the fragment #fg34htx in that page if such a fragment
existed.
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
- [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Thomas Fruin
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney