Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 04:08 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE113A0AA8
for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id BS1XfjtDGkAd for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 20 May 2020 21:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D1A3A0AA6
for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw04.schlund.de ([10.72.72.50]) by mrelay.perfora.net
(mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHIph-1jp2eL3p6B-00E7IO
for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 06:08:54 +0200
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 00:08:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1888561123.43509.1590034134659@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>,
<ead89691-e0a4-e1dc-4d79-fbe65722731b@it.aoyama.ac.jp>,
<122709156.27676.1590010716156@email.ionos.com>
<5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev31
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FMKiz6raTd78ja9FpASNUq6EIGQWlifcb/WVYmjv1U4mooQpNev
8hZT33oiht+7BIDh8HMrVviOYFs2I3gO44n7xge9XPbtuOjKjtDJ09y0wmitGjbTbZU7O2H
Mj2ssMv4nvP4vQjv3X1pPrS0kY/Ltwxt5WJ71Ar3fw+9rbbXJlyUwWMxxPjAenMq+uwJWnF
gShZIx50a5PwoMbRTkd9Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:QkZpf8zgUuQ=:AO/CkLxbJusFVoBLZGcraZ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-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/thMfiWZydGDo1w1GN32AjWYo4Pg>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>,
<mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>,
<mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 04:08:58 -0000
On May 20, 2020 at 11:34 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote:
On 20 May 2020 at 17:38, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
I followed your instructions and I could not recreate what you wantedme to see. Here are the two pages I made:< http://www.soupsdeli.com/base.html" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.soupsdeli.com/base.html>< http://www.soupsdeli.com/drop" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.soupsdeli.com/drop>Perhaps it had something to do with the hosting provider?? I'm notsure what's wrong here.This is the content of your first page:
<!doctype html><html><head><meta charset="us-ascii"><title>test link</title>
</head><body><div> <h2><a href=' http://drop#fg34htx'" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://drop#fg34htx' target="_blank"rel="noopener">Link to drop URI</a></div></body></html>
As you can see, the "href" value doesn't have "drop#fg34htx" byitself as requested; it has a " http://" before it. This transforms itinto a http URI with "drop" as its domain, which my browser"helpfully" converts into a link to drop.com. It would presumablythen go to the fragment #fg34htx in that page if such a fragmentexisted.
--== Dan ==Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://mailformat.dan.info/Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://webtips.dan.info/Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://domains.dan.info/
- [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Dave Thaler
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Michael Wojcik
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Thomas Fruin
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Timothy Mcsweeney