Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> Tue, 13 October 2009 07:44 UTC
Return-Path: <danbri@danbri.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA303A6928 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cD1txVRV5Stu for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8083A6407 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so2297403eye.51 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.85.147 with SMTP id u19mr2275501wee.88.1255419844836; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1255395156.5481.10083.camel@dbooth-laptop>
References: <20091009160149.GB16908@braingia.org> <1255366894.5481.8445.camel@dbooth-laptop> <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771@POCZTOWIEC> <1255395156.5481.10083.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:44:04 +0200
Message-ID: <eb19f3360910130044q59145662m5d683b0589119cea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:08:37 -0700
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:44:09 -0000
[snip] David, Can I suggest a new workflow for these ideas? Instead of intervening when every new URI scheme proposal comes through these lists, perhaps you could work to persuade the W3C TAG of them instead? I think I understand where you're coming from, but the approach is pretty alien to URIs as currently deployed, particularly with regard to browser infrastructure, which at the moment is universally keyed off of the scheme prefix and unlikely to change rapidly due to the huge security implications. There might be something in these ideas (though I remain generally skeptical when it comes to protocols - such as ssh - rather than content/object identifiers eg. doi, xri, ...). At the moment they're being discussed in an ad hoc way whenever someone proposes a new scheme. Could it be more efficient to propose and refine them through the TAG, perhaps? cheers, Dan
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI 'Steve Suehring'
- [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI John Cowan
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Bob Aman
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Conrad Parker
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Dan Brickley
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI Paul Prescod