IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D40512DA07 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:31:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNhPq5u6_odE for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-f169.google.com (mail-ua0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCEF1201F8 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x33so4748523uac.2 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:31:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ud0ZfvXtpg1nOzGZ255dAXaU0mwg1B+4hgfPG0aRgRc=; b=gu3Cd92txN8y4mXVPhIFYgMIlCk22UDbcQaZE6AwREHwkaXBS7goepkoquHQ9AIV4j i3uvP5X+NR3/myZCm7g/f90/8VCoJMJIrNbJuBnz1tF9J40MIfist0lny1All8rwnHBc dN72kWdoYeZOMiCib2ErZm5BZ54cbKRRGOh1bwqHcMNrR686UFtz021O3KfTCOOTSjmM YCYjA9tw/m503p5geUWt2lqFkaSeUnSsZ3idVul7dqrB4gdfBQdHSZ44VmGZ+FVQHX85 vAP0C452oexd6fUKUB3oYXF5YvN+hxnTVUWw8O8KafvRjgV8FdQ+P6fzkne2wpGcfy93 G4/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ud0ZfvXtpg1nOzGZ255dAXaU0mwg1B+4hgfPG0aRgRc=; b=mBJj09Q400lrVn/kLwAWL4F+VSVDkHH1z6QFDQxgLU4BjNtcGv7dEGQXNad2atgF1z iK9kPxxt7qx2KBxqmk1xtn37HDRvSjcQWh27axSSndjAAOh9V74XtxqHennDYmDt2pV8 mAZH8oEuYQ66/7kNH3Oiw25DFcUm5cSDYe3XiI/tmgfN4fi8DF6izlEg6vNYTwwpXcI+ aNsYkSWU+s93Wcp55tOlMKn6/NthZoY00oYHFQd1GxhqV6qm8LzvlxmqpbSoZSZKGZDC 6KePiisbTUv1uS0shxE4N0JZTxPaPGdmVtjWQBcnJYzemMia5RBnhByOi6vlNTIrldv+ dhIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd9vz7gHnVFZ3giCKokdxRSHhREAuYD4gQibXKZQ5OvB7xhMjRd IXZqmCWunuklV1wsMqpJ9rKZjXA34mb8fpMVgW8jhE0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227Rlw+6zUm3F4R6Whc/Dn762V/zlYpB8d0iiK/2aLPl0L2fVPr6yQ3+gpxXgmdywHbjiFijwI8JAcNkjvgS8n0=
X-Received: by 10.159.34.102 with SMTP id 93mr7111320uad.74.1516879807705; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:30:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.10.27 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:29:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:29:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHhFybp_Kuta38TOANUJ1HkMdPoF5eu43gfkEruRfE+eZh3vuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
Cc: IETF URI review <uri-review@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cf9ca1af9f70563981ad8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/wvKU4Haw5DqBIoro8ilQGXhQcaM>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:31:10 -0000

>
> Do you think "app" would be acceptable again if we brought back in focus
> the application aspect, and perhaps also covered non-file resources such
> as UI states?
>

No, "app" is just a seriously bad idea, how about "tapp" matching the title
of your I-D "The Archive and Packaging Pointer". Not "tapps", folks would
think that the S is about security, and you don't have that in your I-D.

While at it, your I-D doesn't mention <base> as a related concept, maybe it
should.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email