IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status

Graham Klyne <gklyne@gmail.com> Wed, 23 February 2022 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <gklyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF603A0CA7 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id toVw5zs86MV1 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E5B3A0CA5 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id u1so39358562wrg.11 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lGzKbKM/ehqw69wRvrmHhA6Jwqs/o8eTfRgcVmGzpU4=; b=Ms+Lz8V0y3tbQguEaG9WVVuOy7jYYQqiNXWC0fAdu39xbo8NOfGiNgWakhiZHMCmfZ EUq2p+rHSjbRpCM/Qo8o/pxGcJEnlDZAN2L2F1je2WMS7+y6FNeUpvSYBo8qMLFQ/dAM cPO80Yhwr2ER3zk0y/rp64yUyToUP4gpVs5RdFOBkNZjZIQKFr8cIxF+61++9cbiZu/c 21CLF0ypXeMYDmrqJEDYJV0rmwSWp+ESgYl+F1N+MmnXkKnoRmDKs0slQ0pH/uSSCDIq +qzNNBvRY0QVaKSMU5KzfkbDJmWdqUtLfBROacPYJ7NVSSub19xlpz/9PPuT9Gn668v9 2rYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lGzKbKM/ehqw69wRvrmHhA6Jwqs/o8eTfRgcVmGzpU4=; b=8JfCTIyjtWp0MDMOoUiJrQ5600uaIhNt8z9aCtfyMLLUiW7J/7+5tZ99fdpu/58fcP YMgTF5ntucAGAyutnSjMCTPyZabZjWz1yZlAvqN99x2hqXBxUhTHF5vqa+2UJ/0Ue1Um 65Lt5nNkTr2K9lOnbz+c7BJm27k4aPe3mUnR3vPiBHjt1NEjuzTP4UKdkNLecClxHoEx oECoHyPYY6/nxFxKKOdPE9qG7IhTPBH9ZwS9xm2g8n4ZXgtULAW1tTZyTkGoUpZQNpPq r4RzYZaHN+THsn34o+GTfRWJEuo5p/FNFv7L/Lu+yqZv/BLu0kt9VOAi6ceSwXvTzJGj wVNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UIStH9QG8HH7IkuSwWGHxtFY9sv03+QzdgG3LQaOtpPz9xUQM uX2AaJHFIzQsQETba4X1peFH27HXk70=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6vtzrBw1R5qcU496+U9n6QJ0PFgz3FE/p4qWoUqroWs/SvFN1BJcs7gBxx5fnojdaSlJ5Dw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1e08:b0:1ed:9e9a:214e with SMTP id bj8-20020a0560001e0800b001ed9e9a214emr3335187wrb.218.1645619796650; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [193.123.216.114] (gklyne38.plus.com. [81.174.129.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm37650052wrs.46.2022.02.23.04.36.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <eea887ae-7a49-fc64-690b-4dcb46cb38dc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:36:31 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>, uri-review@ietf.org
Cc: Scott Vrusho <scott_vrusho@pnp-hcl.com>, Robert S Sielken <rsielken@pnp-hcl.com>
References: <OF9EA0B359.6CAFEE0E-ON002587F0.006B73B3-002587F0.006BDE9B@pnp-hcl.com>
From: Graham Klyne <gklyne@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF9EA0B359.6CAFEE0E-ON002587F0.006B73B3-002587F0.006BDE9B@pnp-hcl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/xiirH-iAjjOR638z1BkfjecH3WY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:04:31 -0800
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:36:44 -0000

What are you asking to be reviewed?  I can't see any documentation.

An XML attachment isn't helpful for reviewing purposes, and I can't find any 
similarly-named published IETF draft.

I suggest that publication as an IETF draft and providing a link here would 
facilitate helpful reviews.

#g



On 21/02/2022 19:38, Doug Conmy wrote:
> The scheme is currently provisional: 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes 
> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes>
> As I understand it, XML is the preferred format and has been included.
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
> Doug Conmy
> HCL Software
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email