IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 May 2012 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C33421F861A for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+-Z4B6lxUWr for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D7A21F85B1 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qadz3 with SMTP id z3so718596qad.10 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NYWcK1izCGHkkIeMQCOsz9igSAzBf6HIMUQfXfHBKCU=; b=X447dydvKRzH8jNQoc2dWQkXgwv3zurJswt62Y82VjJ/j1Ab+A76Wbea7lo3TRakny IU8sxkxcwDzZDOZVewX+V6mKXlmGlO5QoJ+xy5RT6CDqgZxr3NgKqp/NTg6yd57TsgEI UhlUelXEPrZHParNf8BhaWx3Y7xtUKEeW3Wy3DLJ8mURY7AQc6i3s4t+rcHCkWLOjrSD Gi+laQPuWrwh+M4vcbDDyOGBQ1CAbLzgb0ZihGctg7x2QzvnHW0WH2WLr9sZkQNrW3dR nLc8+fR46DYMARbUedvV7PIVDnl7wZxz0Bcu15IRCrdYCqh/11TilbBRGhbW+dJwqcsu hlgA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.116.7 with SMTP id k7mr12905820vcq.13.1336497083361; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.162.99 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FA8F231.90407@gmx.de>
References: <4F99665D.8060404@ericsson.com> <CA+9kkMAvr6eXHzB_HMVgGqBHpUpeuh-mrWRP6-Ap0w3SZLvV-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FA13522.6020103@ericsson.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D194AD547DE@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4FA8EB2E.8070609@ericsson.com> <4FA8F231.90407@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 10:11:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCOatpOO2P5c0PxSt=CKfUCG2pOaKYNkP-e-80ianps1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 17:11:25 -0000

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> Can't I even say that fragments is not allowed for a scheme?
>
>
> No.

I'm not sure I agree with this.  If a registration is intended to
create an identifier that has no associated resource (and thus no
media type), it could say that fragments are not permitted.  This is a
restatement of something that can be inferred from 3986, but I think
it's a useful thing to reinforce.

regards,

Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email