IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)

Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB71921F9F1D for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DYVhxc2+FEvz for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og113.obsmtp.com (exprod6og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A0C21F9EEF for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob113.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUcScW3SCMQgd4jvuUjXSM0iqhbo5I/ZM@postini.com; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:33:00 PDT
Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5LIWwAI007250 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5LIWv6B028205 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:32:57 -0700
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:32:54 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
Thread-Index: Ac5uo2aX2gGamEhBQ9KPOZlaLjoLNwACg4gw
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D347221DBE6@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
References: <CAB5WduCMF+HMyHPFU1bJkOcbzpyAM063XvCM-uDn2zGAoZkFEg@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3471E4101A@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CAB5WduCz4nRSeMUVKnjmUNEDxzRB54khCiU2-1sqCYr1TKLSFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB5WduAmmMkwBs5fU4Nzz1S8mTqn_oBp+7j0APSOib51OVSdTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB5WduAmmMkwBs5fU4Nzz1S8mTqn_oBp+7j0APSOib51OVSdTA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:33:07 -0000

I'm sorry if you took my polite reply as anything other than
a strong negative. No, 'nym' seems inappropriate as a URI
scheme as poposed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DataPacRat [mailto:datapacrat@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:19 AM
> To: Larry Masinter
> Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Initial inquiry into URI proposal (nym)
> 
> It's been about a week, and I haven't got any significant feedback on
> nym, either positive or negative. So, unless some reason crops up to
> do otherwise, I'll probably work on working through the RFC 4395
> process whenever I have some spare time to do so; and since there
> doesn't seem to be any rush, I'll take the time to do the best job I
> can at every step.
> 
> (For example, I'm now going to consult with some experts about
> calibrating the example levels of decibans.)
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> --
> DataPacRat
> "Then again, I could be wrong."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email