IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review requested: VEMMI URL scheme

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Thu, 22 August 1996 07:08 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa26094; 22 Aug 96 3:08 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa26090; 22 Aug 96 3:08 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02989; 22 Aug 96 3:08 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id CAA26754 for uri-out; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:49:24 -0400
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA26739 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:49:16 -0400
Received: from domen.uninett.no by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA01133 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Thu, 22 Aug 96 02:49:14 -0400
Received: from dale.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <24391-0@domen.uninett.no>; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 08:48:34 +0200
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA07505; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 00:08:40 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Cc: directorate@apps.ietf.org, uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Review requested: VEMMI URL scheme
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:02:45 EDT." <2.2.32.19960821170245.00c43afc@pop3hub.is.chrysler.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Id: <7501.840665320.1@dale.uninett.no>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 00:08:40 +0200
Message-Id: <7503.840665320@dale.uninett.no>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

It's something the ITU cooked up to be a competitor to the Web, I think.
I have no idea whether it will succeed or not, but I don't think we
should block it (IF the document provides context enough so that people
can tell where to find out what it is, AND we find no glaring errors...)

           Harald A

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email