IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft

John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net> Thu, 17 April 1997 06:44 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa19501; 17 Apr 97 2:44 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03617; 17 Apr 97 2:44 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA05779 for uri-out; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA05774 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:30:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.jck.com by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA28264 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Thu, 17 Apr 97 02:30:31 -0400
Received: from tp7.Jck.com ("port 1246"@tp7.jck.com) by a4.jck.com (PMDF V5.1-8 #21705) with SMTP id <0E8RREO08001WO@a4.jck.com> for uri@bunyip.com; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:30:21 -0400
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>
Subject: Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft
In-Reply-To: <33554D4F.3194@parc.xerox.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>, uri@bunyip.com, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
Message-Id: <SIMEON.9704170221.C@tp7.Jck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Simeon for Win32 Version 4.1.1 Build (14)
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Priority: NORMAL
X-Authentication: none
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 16 Apr 1997 15:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Larry Masinter 
<masinter@parc.xerox.com> wrote:

> Martin,
> 
> Just to correct an apparent misimpression, you say:
> 
> "and the solutions are adopted by the IAB (as Larry has told me)"
> 
> While the work that went into RFC 2070 was valuable, and while
> I made some good headway in explaining this approach at the IAB
> character set workshop, 
>...
> So it's really overstating the case to say that RFC 2070 was
> "adopted by the IAB". As far as I am aware personally, there
> is no official IAB or IESG policy.

Indeed.
      john

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status