IMAP URLs
Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com> Sun, 17 November 1996 23:51 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa22193; 17 Nov 96 18:51 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24316;
17 Nov 96 18:51 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
SAA20885 for uri-out; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 18:33:33 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by
services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA20880 for
<uri@services.bunyip.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 18:33:31 -0500
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP
(5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b)
id AA09808 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com);
Sun, 17 Nov 96 18:33:29 -0500
Received: from eleanor.innosoft.com ("port 38353"@ELEANOR.INNOSOFT.COM)
by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-7 #8694) id <01IBYH8F3BE29OE2O3@INNOSOFT.COM> for
uri@bunyip.com; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 15:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 15:33:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
Subject: IMAP URLs
To: URI list <uri@bunyip.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.95.961117151842.29171E-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
With the major web browser vendors all committed to supporting IMAP, it's clear we really need an IMAP URL format. I have written an internet draft: <ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-newman-url-imap-02.txt> with my preliminary proposal. I'm not experienced in URL design so I based it on RFC 1738 as much as I could. I would very much appreciate review by this community *before* it moves any further. I know I need to add a section on relative URLs and swap the order of the parameters and queries based on RFC 1808. As far as I know, the IMAP URL scheme is the first to address the issue of multiple strong authentication mechanisms. I'd very much appreciate comments on that topic. I also believe there is a bug in RFC 1808 with respect to multiple parameters. I think the relative URL should inherit all parameters form the base URL, except those that are specified in the relative URL. The current spec indicates that if *any* parameter is present in the relative URL, it overrides all parameters in the base URL. Comments? Thanks in advance for your help!
- IMAP URLs Chris Newman
- Re: IMAP URLs Martin J Duerst
- Re: IMAP URLs Chris Newman
- Re: IMAP URLs Larry Masinter
- Re: IMAP URLs Chris Newman
- Re: IMAP URLs Larry Masinter
- Re: IMAP URLs Tim Berners-Lee