Re: IMAP URLs

Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Tue, 26 November 1996 03:22 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa28472; 25 Nov 96 22:22 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23937; 25 Nov 96 22:22 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id VAA03209 for uri-out; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 21:59:39 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA03204 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 21:59:37 -0500
Received: from alpha.Xerox.COM by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA11185 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Mon, 25 Nov 96 21:59:04 -0500
Received: from palimpsest.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.101.126]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15862(1)>; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 18:59:02 PST
Received: by palimpsest.parc.xerox.com id <135>; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 18:58:49 PDT
To: Chris.Newman@innosoft.com
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.961117151842.29171E-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com> (message from Chris Newman on Sun, 17 Nov 1996 15:33:03 PST)
Subject: Re: IMAP URLs
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Nov25.185849pdt."135"@palimpsest.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 17:58:49 PST
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

Chris,

There's not much time at the IETF URL-BOF to say much about the IMAP
URL scheme except to point out to people to read it. However, please
check out 

	draft-fielding-url-syntax-00.txt

to see if the (revised) description of generic URL schemes clarifies
those things that were ambiguous from RFC 1738 & RFC 1808.

# I also believe there is a bug in RFC 1808 with respect to multiple
# parameters.  I think the relative URL should inherit all parameters form
# the base URL, except those that are specified in the relative URL.  The
# current spec indicates that if *any* parameter is present in the relative
# URL, it overrides all parameters in the base URL.  Comments?

The goal originally was to revise 1738 & 1808 to make them consistent
with current practice. What would current web browsers do with
relative URLs with multiple parameters?

Larry