IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?

"Ronald E. Daniel" <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov> Wed, 04 October 1995 22:23 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20132; 4 Oct 95 18:23 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20128; 4 Oct 95 18:23 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03865; 4 Oct 95 18:23 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id RAA23583 for uri-out; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:52:18 -0400
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA23578 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:52:15 -0400
Received: from acl.lanl.gov by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA29621 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Wed, 4 Oct 95 17:52:14 -0400
Received: from whatthe.acl.lanl.gov (whatthe.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.148.97]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.6.11/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA27936; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 15:52:12 -0600
Received: (rdaniel@localhost) by whatthe.acl.lanl.gov (8.6.11/8.6.4) id PAA00973; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 15:52:12 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Ronald E. Daniel" <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <9510041552.ZM971@whatthe.acl.lanl.gov>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 15:52:11 -0600
In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> "no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?" (Oct 4, 1:43pm)
References: <95Oct4.134325pdt.2763@golden.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 06sep94)
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

On Oct 4,  1:43pm, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Subject: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF?
> Discussion of charters & WG milestones seem to have died down, and no
> one has requested any WG or BOF slots....
> 
> If maybe things are happening offline and you don't need to meet?

Sorry that I have not kept everyone informed on this. I have
submitted the URC-WG charter to John and Harald and am waiting to
hear from them on the status of the URC-WG. I have continued
to work on URCs, and have some stuff that I am about ready to
send to the URC list. People who want to see the rough notes
can take a look at http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URC/canonical.html

If the URC-WG charter is accepted, I would hope that we would meet
in Dallas to talk about the canonical representation and how it
does or doesn't meet the needs of the various protocols.

Regards,



-- 
Ron Daniel Jr.                email: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
Advanced Computing Lab        voice: (505) 665-0597
MS B-287  TA-3  Bldg. 2011      fax: (505) 665-4939
Los Alamos National Lab        http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel/
Los Alamos, NM,  87545    tautology: "Conformity is very popular"

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email