Re: URLs for different address spaces
Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Wed, 05 June 1996 23:19 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05389;
5 Jun 96 19:19 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05385;
5 Jun 96 19:19 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16511;
5 Jun 96 19:19 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
TAA13012 for uri-out; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 19:06:34 -0400
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by
services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA13005 for
<uri@services.bunyip.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 19:06:32 -0400
Received: from alpha.Xerox.COM by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP
(5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b)
id AA12425 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com);
Wed, 5 Jun 96 19:06:24 -0400
Received: from golden.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.100.139]) by alpha.xerox.com with
SMTP id <16212(8)>; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:06:07 PDT
Received: by golden.parc.xerox.com id <2733>; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:06:05 -0700
To: eguttman@spar.incog.com
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: Erik Guttman's message of Wed,
5 Jun 1996 08:51:10 PDT <199606051551.IAA15962@spar.incog.com>
Subject: Re: URLs for different address spaces
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Fake-Sender: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Message-Id: <96Jun5.160605pdt.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:05:53 PDT
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
I know the folks working on ILU (ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/ilu/ilu.html) were working on a URL format for ILU object ports that might not be IPv4. And certainly HTTP URLs need not refer to the IPv4 host, they could refer to IPv6. (There was a recent message on http-wg on this point, but I'm having trouble finding it at the moment.) I think the main issue for new URL schemes is that we're currently expecting them to be defined by RFCs. But if you have positive proposals, why don't you bring them forward? While URI-WG might revive with a new (very narrow) charter to review the (soon-to-be) revised URL / relative URL drafts and push them toward Draft Standard, it's likely not to be in a position to vet completely new schemes. Larry
- URLs for different address spaces Erik Guttman
- Re: URLs for different address spaces Larry Masinter