Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?)
Patrik Faltstrom <paf@bunyip.com> Fri, 08 March 1996 06:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07591;
8 Mar 96 1:13 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07587;
8 Mar 96 1:13 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02158;
8 Mar 96 1:13 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
AAA03530 for uri-out; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 00:49:11 -0500
Received: from [130.128.2.202] (laptop202.ietf.interop.net [130.128.2.202]) by
services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA03525;
Fri, 8 Mar 1996 00:48:52 -0500
X-Sender: paf@paf.se
Message-Id: <v0214060bad6579675539@[130.128.2.202]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 21:48:48 -0800
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, keld@dkuug.dk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Patrik Faltstrom <paf@bunyip.com>
Subject: Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?)
Cc: martin@terena.nl, wg-i18n@terena.nl, uri@bunyip.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
At 21.12 96-03-06, Larry Masinter wrote: >While uppercase mapping is culturally sensitive, can we not make a >culturally independent 'character matching' algorithm that is good >enough for directory services. Perhaps it means treating accented and >unaccented versions of French initial capitals equivalent, even though >this equivalence is not determined by 'canonicalization'? One can discuss if the algorithm is correct or not, but that algorithm is defined in UNICODE 1.1, i.e. both decomposition rules and how to do case-independent matches. Note that I am not claiming that it is correct - any of the two lagorithms, but the good thing is that we have _one_ definition and that is what is needed in this case. Patrik -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bunyip Information Systems Inc. Montreal, Quebec, CANADA Internet: paf@bunyip.com Phone: +1-514-875-8611 In theory, it's no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, it is.
- 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Alexander Dupuy
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Masataka Ohta
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Alexander Dupuy
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Larry Masinter
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Larry Masinter
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Masataka Ohta
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Patrik Faltstrom
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Peter Paul Sint
- Re: 8 bit characters in DNS names (and URNs?) Masataka Ohta