Re: localization

"Hamilton,Dennis" <Dennis_Hamilton@pa.xerox.com> Tue, 06 February 1996 18:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17496; 6 Feb 96 13:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17492; 6 Feb 96 13:52 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11537; 6 Feb 96 13:52 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id MAA00487 for uri-out; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:47:06 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA00482 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:47:04 -0500
Received: from alpha.Xerox.COM by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA02030 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Tue, 6 Feb 96 12:46:52 -0500
Received: from x-wb-ngm-mime.cinops.xerox.com ([13.250.20.31]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15344(4)>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:46:47 PST
X-Nvlenv-01Date-Transferred: 06-Feb-1996 09:42:46 -0800; at X-PA-AREA-HUB.xerox
X-Nvlenv-01Date-Transferred: 6-Feb-1996 12:49:25 -0500; at X-WB-NGM-MIME.XEROX
X-Nvlenv-01Date-Posted: 06-Feb-1996 09:43:51 -0500; at X-PA-PAHV-XS-MS1.xerox
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 06:40:51 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Hamilton,Dennis" <Dennis_Hamilton@pa.xerox.com>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: localization
Message-Id: <"<FB5F173181CF617C>FB5F173181CF617C@X-PA-PAHV-XS-MS1.xerox"@-SMF->
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

In an earlier exchange on the the URI distribution list, you made the 
 comment "that's why localization doesn't work" or something like that.

I thought that was interesting.

On reflection, I'm not clear what you saw.

Are you saying that there is an inherent defect in localization?  Do 
 you mean in principle or in a particular way of doing it?

I want to understand this better.

Dennis