Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft

Keld J|rn Simonsen <> Tue, 22 April 1997 14:00 UTC

Received: from cnri by id aa27868; 22 Apr 97 10:00 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10521; 22 Apr 97 10:00 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA00595 for uri-out; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mocha.Bunyip.Com []) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA00590 for <>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:18:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from by with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA04260 (mail destined for; Tue, 22 Apr 97 09:18:11 -0400
Received: (from keld@localhost) by (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA16930; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:17:57 +0200
Message-Id: <>
From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:17:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: Jonathan Rosenne <> "Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft" (Apr 22, 13:41)
X-Charset: ISO-8859-1
X-Char-Esc: 29
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mnemonic-Intro: 29
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.2 4/12/91)
To: Jonathan Rosenne <>, "[unknown]" <>
Subject: Re: revised "generic syntax" internet draft
Precedence: bulk

Jonathan Rosenne writes:

> Message text written by Keld J|rn Simonsen
> >The natural thing there is that URLs are encoded in the charset of the
> HTML document.<
> When I see it in a magazine how am I to know what charset the document had
> used?

I don't think you can see the encoding of the HTML document reproduced
in a magazine. And I was not addressing that quirk of reading
HTML in magazines, but when you have the actual file with the
HTML statements.

If you read the HTML in a magazine, well then you just read the 
abstract characters. If you want to use the URL, then you type
it in to your browser and then you are in the case described by
Martin and Frangois.