Edward Cherlin <> Wed, 23 April 1997 15:57 UTC

Received: from cnri by id aa13606; 23 Apr 97 11:57 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13353; 23 Apr 97 11:57 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA08384 for uri-out; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 11:23:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mocha.Bunyip.Com []) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA08379 for <>; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 11:23:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from by with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA12789 (mail destined for; Wed, 23 Apr 97 11:22:50 -0400
Received: from [] ( []) by (8.8.5/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA24258 for <uri@Bunyip.Com>; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 08:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v03007855af7b9913a3c8@[]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:17:27 -0700
From: Edward Cherlin <>
Subject: Noise
Precedence: bulk

Out of all of this noise, I detected a real issue. %HH encoding is used for
non-character data. Using it for UTF-8 at the same time would be ambiguous.
I don't know how often this conflict would arise, but it is a real issue.
So we need another solution. That might mean we want another encoding of
the UTF-8 which can be distinguished from %HH. However, this is a separate

The rest of the noise seems to be about how much of the problem Martin's
proposal would solve, with answers ranging from "none at all" to "quite a
lot", and about how much it needs to solve, with answers ranging from
"everything" to "a fair amount" respectively.

I would suggest a retreat from the "Yes, it works!" "No, it doesn't!" style
of argument to the Quaker method of verifying that you understand the
question before firing off answers, except that I would expect to be
roundly ignored. [sigh]

Edward Cherlin     Everything should be made
Vice President     Ask. Someone knows.       as simple as possible,
NewbieNet, Inc.                                 __but no simpler__.                Attributed to Albert Einstein

  • Noise  Edward Cherlin