IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: URN Namespace for MEF

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 16 October 2015 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394371A87D1 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7UgVfh5wH0Wc for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A631A8748 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9746; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444992155; x=1446201755; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=EnJiSVSWNvXiOns+D3sZ9zdawNqU512bdfurCnbKjQI=; b=Rylf8c8vZoHlb4N6BA+ExJ3zZwP9j7MmLCi5/x0dVCRBh2yk494piqKI A34YQHLy/j+ePeOJ2gW0ZCVxGiNqfq7lRNZWd4oGa4aM6BNdS9IOh3QlB OBlcVkfwNu+71N9u5l06xrZvKz0tNP/OJEKdx2m4aekak+NVOjOyiRkRz k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKAQDh0yBW/xbLJq1eDoJLgSFuvWcBDYFZIYV9AoFsFAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmAQEBAwEjCkwFBwQLFQIBCR4DAgIPAhAlCQgGAQwGAgEBBYgQAwoIDa94jhYNhREBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXhnaEfoJQgVoRAVEGAQaCY4FFBY0PiQ6LJ4F0gViEOoMBhDKHAodJHwEBQoIRHYEXQDwzAYQmgUABAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,688,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="630358641"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 10:42:33 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.89] (ams-bclaise-8918.cisco.com [10.60.67.89]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9GAgW2n027939; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:42:32 GMT
Subject: Re: URN Namespace for MEF
To: "Ranganathan, Raghu" <rraghu@ciena.com>, "mjethanandani@gmail.com" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "urn-nid@apps.ietf.org" <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>, "duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <679E55ADEABC9443947F5AD6F3ED464A21AF849AC6@ONWVEXCHMB03.ciena.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5620D489.80209@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:42:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <679E55ADEABC9443947F5AD6F3ED464A21AF849AC6@ONWVEXCHMB03.ciena.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070600090009070200070409"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/5OPvzi9gsuckRjeu4c_U4_Pb5f0>
Cc: "jason.wolfe@bell.ca" <jason.wolfe@bell.ca>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:42:38 -0000

My point was to submit the draft to the IETF web site.
The deadline is in a couple of days. See 
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates-2015.html#ietf94

Regards, Benoit

> Benoit
> Please check email. Attachment was there.
>
> --Raghu
> Sent from my phone
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
> *Received:* Friday, 16 Oct 2015, 5:11AM
> *To:* Ranganathan, Raghu [rraghu@ciena.com]; mjethanandani@gmail.com 
> [mjethanandani@gmail.com]; urn-nid@apps.ietf.org 
> [urn-nid@apps.ietf.org]; duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp [duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
> *CC:* jason.wolfe@bell.ca [jason.wolfe@bell.ca]
> *Subject:* Re: URN Namespace for MEF
>
> I meant draft-mahesh-mef-urn-00
>
> Regards, Benoit
>> Would "draft" be referring to draft for MANN doc?
>>
>> Regarding "MEF Forum", there is no expansion for MEF (after a recent 
>> change in name).
>>
>> --Raghu
>> Sent from my phone
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> *From:* Martin J. Dürst [duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
>> *Received:* Friday, 16 Oct 2015, 4:52AM
>> *To:* Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]; Mahesh Jethanandani 
>> [mjethanandani@gmail.com]; urn-nid@apps.ietf.org [urn-nid@apps.ietf.org]
>> *CC:* Wolfe, Jason (P020296) [jason.wolfe@bell.ca]; Ranganathan, 
>> Raghu [rraghu@ciena.com]
>> *Subject:* Re: URN Namespace for MEF
>>
>> On 2015/10/16 18:32, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> > Mahesh,
>> >
>> > I believe that you should submit the draft.
>>
>> Yes, please. Also, it would be good to give an expansion of "MEF".
>> Somewhere, something like "MEF" = "MEF Forum" turns up, but that still
>> doesn't say anything to an outsider.
>>
>> Regards,   Martin.
>>
>> > Regards, Benoit
>> >> This submission is for a URN NID for MEF. Comments are welcome on this
>> >> draft.
>> >>
>> >> There is a companion document, called the MEF Assignment of Names and
>> >> Numbers (MANN) that is an MEF document under discussion, and has some
>> >> of the answers in this template. The attached drafts points to the
>> >> MANN document in the relevant section. MANN will be posted on MEF
>> >> website once the committee has had a chance to review and approve it.
>> >>
>> >> Mahesh Jethanandani
>> >> mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email