Re: Informal URN Namespace Registration Request

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 18 November 2015 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718A41B38A1 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:09:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.065
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9Yhdq7p26o5 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:09:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D40D1B389F for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.116]) by resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id j4911r0062XD5SV0149hnt; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:09:41 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.143.237.82]) by resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id j49g1r00A1nMCLR0149g04; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:09:41 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id tAIG9dbx030740; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:09:39 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id tAIG9cUm030733; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:09:38 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Peter Saint-Andre <peter@andyet.net>
Subject: Re: Informal URN Namespace Registration Request
In-Reply-To: <564B5FAB.80407@andyet.net> (peter@andyet.net)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:09:38 -0500
Message-ID: <87bnargugt.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1447862981; bh=7/lt+lquBlGF804G9nRPoBbpfKr1o6vHWXTspdR0R4k=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=qi9sHdhXTfo6O+xNoP4r84GE4SzIdBTN4XI79XNb1yjxIzcALtuLryI1R0gJZKu6d nkOqpHJ+CVoVwmLMqRjVeX7BEgVhoQWEGF/tLlROtwSCecqp+8YvlLyxUCPcU8nHLX pAF2UFnifr8tFATPeYnnB06uDQAV+FYybJqc0Kl2H5Segp3ymqxTZ2GLUlm5q9G2ce RW/LDCSxV9HfXs21foezZ2drESdwGaX+4AaEFNFw1Oo4wzdvSLlzWHQbInOd3wirss RxwrhcjsKNCKnn3A5IMVo7CMirDRKz8nbrtl0alMjsbcwrNodGLL5LngLa5Pay6FLA nSkbNUrSj+GKQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/AROuHBgi84SzqqGJqrX7fC_6fOw>
Cc: mattias@uchicago.edu, urn-nid@apps.ietf.org, bmccollam@uchicago.edu
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:09:43 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre <peter@andyet.net> writes:
> Why not register urn:globus as a formal namespace? It seems strange for 
> all of the URNs to be of the form urn:urn-8:globus:*

Technically, it would be better to remove the "globus" part, because it
adds no information.  But that may not be feasible from a business point
of view.

Dale