Re: [urn] continued use of urn-nid@ietf.org list

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 09 January 2015 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C4B1A0084; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:46:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nG2GiQG6p88m; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995E41A006C; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Y9fW7-000LLQ-Ju; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:46:43 -0500
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:46:32 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] continued use of urn-nid@ietf.org list
Message-ID: <DA319FA11FF23FFBA390763E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAAw7VHg-XqFaDYgPi_OOzScRMAXx6XEwqHh+WFJ6YfEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5499BA48.5060807@andyet.net> <5499BED1.104@seantek.com> <5499C04C.6040605@andyet.net> <549A58E4.30206@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <844A0581B9447C7703322432@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJJU1XdwrOyTdJ4nobrW8=piQ40Z0=Ay-5KvJY9-iGTEYQ@mail.gmail.com> <1D6DD11066A060EED966B640@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAC4RtVAAw7VHg-XqFaDYgPi_OOzScRMAXx6XEwqHh+WFJ6YfEQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/Adhs1XmKWGAhg0lfL62O-W3P_Ms>
Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org, urn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:46:47 -0000


--On Friday, January 09, 2015 11:50 +0800 Barry Leiba
<barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> Closing the loop on this:
> 
>> Again, I'll defer to your decision about not combining the two
>> lists now, but note that, IMO, the continued separation is
>> weakening the work of this WG and increasing the risk of bad
>> results.
> 
> Thanks.  So here's the deal:
> 
> 1. The IESG has just given approval for draft-higgs-hbbtv-urn,
> and as soon as he posts a new version I'm going to let it go
> out.  That covers the in-process ones.
> 
> 2. I will not start processing on any other URN namespace
> requests until this WG has finished the update.
> 
> 3. I'll watch the time-frame on that, and reserve the right to
> reconsider at some point.
> 
> Fair?

Certainly reasonable.
    john