RE: Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5366212DAFC; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSX1nqXzxd7K; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5435612DBCD; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0053301.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u3KD4OVV024991; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:08:14 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 22e5p064x8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:08:14 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3KD8BGt025434; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:08:12 -0400
Received: from alpi133.aldc.att.com (alpi133.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.3]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3KD80GW025241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:08:05 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.152]) by alpi133.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:07:41 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.50]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:07:41 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>, "urn-nid@ietf.org" <urn-nid@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01
Thread-Topic: Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01
Thread-Index: AdGOhitbQ4UWbC5zT3CFh+5H+csBzQMfzSUQ
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114265B31B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114263C196@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114263C196@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.196.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-04-20_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1603290000 definitions=main-1604200211
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/EsVlNDckVZuy4Zc8W9LHOBSo9bI>
Cc: "Benoit Claise \(bclaise@cisco.com\)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:32:55 -0000

Hi URN experts,
It would be really helpful if someone could take a look at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01 and say if there's anything wrong with it. Thanks,
Barbara

> Hi URN experts,
> A review of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01 would be much
> appreciated. Benoit has said he will AD sponsor this draft.
> 
> Just to tackle an obvious question that will come to the minds of many: Why
> is BBF asking for 3 namespaces?
> 2 of the namespaces requested are historical namespaces that BBF has
> squatted on for many years. Both are in wide use in many service provider
> environments. Because of this, BBF thinks it would be best to get these 2
> legitimized and out of the squatter shadows.
> For new efforts, BBF would like to use the "bbf" namespace.
> 
> Thanks,
> Barbara
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn