Re: A request for formal registration of "ucode" as URN

ishikawa <chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp> Wed, 11 January 2012 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E183A21F85DA for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:50:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.831
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.831 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.605, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HG-epkPdf74R for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from post.ubin.jp (post.ubin.jp [202.32.0.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E6721F85C4 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (post [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.ubin.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 85F5629AE0C for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from home.intra.ubin.jp (home.intra.ubin.jp [10.129.1.1]) by post.ubin.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9C329AE0C; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by home.intra.ubin.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B60426988; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:56 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ubin.jp
Received: from home.intra.ubin.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (home.intra.ubin.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-zVi+6ggWga; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [10.254.225.253] (debian-vbox-ci.ddns.intra.ubin.jp [10.254.225.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by home.intra.ubin.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E4542659B; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:56 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4F0D14F7.9000506@ubin.jp>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:49:59 +0900
From: ishikawa <chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: A request for formal registration of "ucode" as URN
References: <4EF2C203.4010205@ubin.jp> <4EF30BB5.90002@ubin.jp> <4EF7E1B0.8000504@ubin.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EF7E1B0.8000504@ubin.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ishikawa <chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:50:02 -0000

Hi,

I know that the new year and other holidays got in the
work flow (initial two week review),
but I wonder if there are any comments to the
formal request I sent.

Thank you in advance for your attention.

Sincerely,
Chiaki Ishikawa

On (2011年12月26日 11:53), ishikawa wrote:
> FYI, the document is now accessible from
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn/
> 
> TIA and a Happy New Year to all.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Chiaki Ishikawa
> 
> On (2011年12月22日 19:51), ishikawa wrote:
>> Dear sirs/madams,
>>
>> After my initial submission attempt, I received an e-mail from
>> Alfred Hoenes, the co-chair of URNBIS. Per his suggestion, I cancelled the
>> original submission and re-named the document to
>>
>> draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-00
>>
>> and resubmitted.
>>
>> Attached the modified submission draft.
>> I changed the reference to urnbis in the left column heading of the first 
>> page to urn also. (The date is also bumped by one. The date of the IETF 
>> server seems to have changed.)
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your attention.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Chiaki Ishikawa
>>
>>> Speaking as an URNbis co-chair:
>>>
>>> IMHO, work on new URN namespaces, and hence this draft,
>>> currently is out of charter for URNBIS working group
>>> (cf. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/urnbis/charter/ ).
>>> Hence, this draft should be submitted as an individual draft.
>>>
>>> Andy, do you agree?
>>> If so, please act upon the formal refusal.
>>>
>>> Authors, please re-submit as draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-00,
>>> draft-ishikawa-urnbis-yrpunl-ucode-00, or similar.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Alfred H�nes.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | 
>>> TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. | | 
>>> Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 | | D-71254 
>>> Ditzingen | E-Mail: ah@TR-Sys.de | 
>>> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> On (2011年12月22日 14:37), ishikawa wrote:
>>> Dear sirs/madams,
>>>
>>> Allow me to introduce myself.
>>>
>>> I am Chiaki Ishikawa of YRP Ubiquitous Networking Laboratory.
>>> My office is an executive member of an NPO called T-Engine Forum which,
>>> among other things, administrates uID Center which, in turn, manages
>>> an identifier code system called "ucode".
>>>
>>> Here with the request of the team at uID center and the chair of T-Engine
>>> Forum, I am applying for
>>> the formal registration of "ucode".
>>>
>>> Attached is the copy of document with the document name which I am trying to
>>> submit to IETF.
>>>
>>> draft-ietf-urnbis-yrpunl-ucode
>>>
>>> It is at the initial approval stage:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/37780/request/
>>>
>>> So I think I am at the initial stage (step 2) of the following procedure.
>>> (Instead of sending the Internet-Draft, I used the the mechanical submission
>>> process since it seems preferred. But I am not entirely sure
>>> when the initial approval stage passes. Hmm ...)
>>>
>>> Formal NID:
>>>
>>> 1. Write an Internet-Draft describing the namespace and include
>>> the registration template, duly completed. Be sure to include
>>> "Namespace Considerations", "Community Considerations" and
>>> "IANA Considerations" sections, as described in Section 4.3.
>>>
>>> 2. Send the Internet-Draft to the I-D editor, and send a copy to
>>> urn-nid@apps.ietf.org for technical review.
>>>
>>> 3. Update the Internet-Draft as necessary from comments, and
>>> repeat steps 2 and 3 as needed.
>>>
>>> 4. Send a request to the IESG to publish the I-D as an RFC. The
>>> IESG may request further changes (published as I-D revisions)
>>> and/or direct discussion to designated working groups, area
>>> experts, etc.
>>>
>>> 5. If the IESG approves the document for publication as an RFC,
>>> send a request to IANA to register the requested NID.
>>>
>>> Please feel free to ask me questions.
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for your attention.
>>>
>>> I wish you all a pleasant holiday season and a Happy New Year.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Chiaki Ishikawa
>>
>