Re: [urn] continued use of urn-nid@ietf.org list

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Tue, 30 December 2014 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4731ACEEE; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:45:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-IbQwBeBhkT; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F377C1A0041; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.123.151] (unknown [23.241.1.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 887DC22E25F; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:45:45 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [urn] continued use of urn-nid@ietf.org list
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
In-Reply-To: <844A0581B9447C7703322432@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:45:43 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D529934C-2E4C-4874-B427-F1ECE3345A60@seantek.com>
References: <5499BA48.5060807@andyet.net> <5499BED1.104@seantek.com> <5499C04C.6040605@andyet.net> <549A58E4.30206@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <844A0581B9447C7703322432@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
To: urn@ietf.org, urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/_QxbiJjoVKO_teLGFqvrxbZWliQ
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:45:52 -0000

On Dec 25, 2014, at 9:21 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

> draft-seantek-certspec-04
> draft-seantek-rdf-urn-00
> draft-seantek-xmlns-urn-00

Without commenting on the merits of any of the rest of that message…

Please note that draft-seantek-xmlns-urn-00 and draft-seantek-rdf-urn-00 have been replaced with draft-seantek-xmlns-rdf-urns-00, which incorporates prior feedback.

Due to ongoing uncertainty, draft-seantek-certspec-04 is being abandoned in favor of a much more straightforward set of approaches using URIs.

Sean