review requested: "example" NID
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 08 January 2013 04:05 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDB521F867D for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:05:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JEHhp7fKsh-c for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C39621F866E for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.176] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79AED4005D for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:10:45 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50EB9B1C.2060103@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:05:48 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: urn-nid@ietf.org
Subject: review requested: "example" NID
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:05:41 -0000
For review here, as extracted from draft-saintandre-urn-example-01... ### 2. Specification Template 2.1. Namespace ID The Namespace ID "example" is requested. 2.2. Registration Information Version 1 Date: [to be assigned] 2.3. Declared Registrant of the Namespace Registering organization: IETF Designated contact: IESG, iesg@ietf.org 2.4. Declaration of Syntactic Structure The Namespace Specific String (NSS) of all URNs that use the "example" NID shall have the following structure: urn:example:{NSS} The NSS is a mandatory string of ASCII characters [RFC20] that conforms to the URN syntax requirements [RFC2141] and that provides a Saint-Andre Expires July 11, 2013 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Example URNs January 2013 name that is useful within the relevant documentation example, test suite, or other application. 2.5. Relevant Ancillary Documentation See [RFC6648] for information about deprecation of the "x-" convention in protocol parameters and identifiers. 2.6. Identifier Uniqueness Considerations Those who mint example URNs ought to strive for uniqueness in the namespace specific string portion of the URN. However, such uniqueness cannot be guaranteed through the assignment process. As a result, implementers are counselled against using example URNs for any purposes other than documentation, private testing, and truly experimental contexts. 2.7. Identifier Persistence Considerations Once minted, an example URN is immutable. However, it is simply a string and there is no guarantee that the documentation, test suite, or other application using the URN is immutable. 2.8. Process for Identifier Resolution Example URNs are not intended to be resolved, and the namespace is not and probably never will be registered with a Resolution Discovery System. 2.9. Rules for Lexical Equivalence No special considerations; the rules for lexical equivalence specified in [RFC2141] apply. 2.10. Conformance with URN Syntax No special considerations 2.11. Validation Mechanism None 2.12. Scope Global ###
- review requested: "example" NID Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: review requested: "example" NID Martin J. Dürst
- Re: review requested: "example" NID Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: review requested: "example" NID Peter Saint-Andre