RE: URN namespaces Submission for Ad-ID (www.ad-id.org)

Jarrett Wold <jwold@ad-id.org> Fri, 11 March 2016 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jwold@ad-id.org>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8B212D716 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:33:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ad-id.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fLxNK7b_Xhq for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA98D12D829 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x230.google.com with SMTP id td3so77245454pab.2 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ad-id.org; s=google; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5yyEhKFZ8IWihAHF2KogrW4TB+hmbEG+bRA7HuFeBLE=; b=IvlKKxsQUNmxfZxl/BZLhzNJBZ9dMhe+tO2m0lYR3jin9EuSidXbRZ0+LasCw8/RQe V72DK4oyI+eE392YkyD2YDeDM/Lstqhdvvev+Hyh3cX4eXZ8NzlR0FO39kj+2lhn7NFV cIK8PoRKVpW+gCzw/uvebnEXtIUpbOBC3Vbdg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5yyEhKFZ8IWihAHF2KogrW4TB+hmbEG+bRA7HuFeBLE=; b=DXREbIAnlthAexWgwzda0dwd80Pa49tGh7JOqxFEcvUtzoqwaBG08DVhq7vKBLwe+L abBqrydF5ffwDjdnEPDXklBthAgud5Snq2xXdcupKpqLSOZtd/2bp4O2rk3YBTcS4B1k XYPBsjyJtFyPdBqaBh159136ps68DEOr2xgsXWtOcaT0Ol7LjifZRjrRq8+vrgKP0wpV pv6o8ewoS2cI7d1XfSg96fcqT7uxC2m/Q469WTCY9LKqtW8HPeVGIc0RmfdK8Tc2Z0eu 7iENoBRtsTs851bz1rXOiPe7kwkLl6+uDOtiyQcOwVBnp4FoDSnIpbpyjKm1zU9yE8lJ IJYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIHVqda8g6EXmh5Xx696QPKRqHkkN2f/FAiaxxadWOAOU0gIjURFbc9XIXvaTOT5oZDMXxf0XTyOxrRh6CR
X-Received: by 10.66.157.161 with SMTP id wn1mr17479330pab.146.1457717606273; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Jarrett Wold <jwold@ad-id.org>
References: <22a133140ac0f17928f11266f44d5e38@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB0We8F7XE8LuU15N9dXEzNGp0qdmde5Y5swsni8aSH_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMB0We8F7XE8LuU15N9dXEzNGp0qdmde5Y5swsni8aSH_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQHy1ibzGlVWBK90tvnpdbyrkqvKdQFBY3Wpnwe8TbA=
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:34:02 -0500
Message-ID: <74e35829070e97d7a94fb509af439987@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: URN namespaces Submission for Ad-ID (www.ad-id.org)
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86c2001ae1a4052dc954a7
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/kfexUEU6FzgaedzZz3bPXWuSHVk>
Cc: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:33:29 -0000

Hi Ted –

Thanks for the feedback.  Please see my answers inline:



The document states that AD-Id assigns the identifiers and guarantees
uniqueness, but it also notes that the initial section of the identifier is
a company prefix.  Is the process of assignment distributed or centralizes?

A company Prefix created in Ad-ID also unique in our system.  These are
centralized in our system. Example: AAAA, ABCD, AB01, etc.

A company can choose to create a prefix or let the system select a prefix
at random.  If they choose to create a prefix, the system will determine if
it is available and issue it if it is.  Once the prefix is created, it’s
used to create the full Ad-ID codes.



Example:  Company created two prefixes (ABCD & AB99).  Codes will be
generated under both prefixes based on what the user selects

*ABCD*

ABCD0001100

ABCD0002100



*AB99*

AB990001100

AB990002100



The document notes that an ad-id can be validated using ad-id's web
services.  Does or will that interface presenting the urn:adid form or the
urn:adid;cuid form?  If you present an ad-id, does it return the resource
or present metadata about the resource?

A user can use our web services and request by either an adid or the cuid.
Both resources are present in the XML returned (xml elements) as well as
descriptive metadata about the resource.

As a nit, it is more common for the abnf to split out the canonical string
"urn:" and the definition of the nid (in this case adid).

Im not quite clear on this.  Would you mind elaborating?

Thanks again.



*Jarrett Wold *| *Ad-ID LLC*
Director of Technology & Platforms
646-708-8131

jwold@ad-id.org







*From:* Ted Hardie [mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 11:54 AM
*To:* Jarrett Wold <jwold@ad-id.org>;
*Cc:* urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: URN namespaces Submission for Ad-ID (www.ad-id.org)



Hi Jarrett,

I've done a quick review and I have a couple of questions.  The document
states that AD-Id assigns the identifiers and guarantees uniqueness, but it
also notes that the initial section of the identifier is a company prefix.
Is the process of assignment distributed or centralizes?

The document notes that an ad-id can be validated using ad-id's web
services.  Does or will that interface presenting the urn:adid form or the
urn:adid;cuid form?  If you present an ad-id, does it return the resource
or present metadata about the resource?

As a nit, it is more common for the abnf to split out the canonical string
"urn:" and the definition of the nid (in this case adid).

regards,

Ted Hardie



On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jarrett Wold <jwold@ad-id.org>; wrote:

Hello –

I am resubmitting a request for an URN on behalf of Ad-ID as an Internet
Draft.



Thank You



*Jarrett Wold *| *Ad-ID LLC*
Director of Technology & Platforms
646-708-8131

jwold@ad-id.org