Re: review requested: "example" NID

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 08 January 2013 04:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06BC11E80A5 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:28:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ww1JmBRYwpCr for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D13711E8097 for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:28:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.176] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A6FA4005D; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:33:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50EBA084.3000506@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:28:52 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: review requested: "example" NID
References: <50EB9B1C.2060103@stpeter.im> <50EB9E48.7000307@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <50EB9E48.7000307@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:28:45 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 1/7/13 9:19 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 13:05, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> For review here, as extracted from
>> draft-saintandre-urn-example-01...
> 
> 
>> 2.8.  Process for Identifier Resolution
>> 
>> Example URNs are not intended to be resolved, and the namespace
>> is not and probably never will be registered with a Resolution
>> Discovery System.
> 
> Just a question: What if somebody, in some system, registers this
> so that it resolves to an explanation that these are only
> examples?

I had not considered that possibility, but I suppose it could happen!

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlDroIMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzMKQCbBKAN9WEqC8jxObdFMs74iPc2
nesAnjkhHgI+z+b1X9NevQxDG1RGevef
=yxo6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----