IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-chen-rdns-urn-05 (Re: two-week review: registering formal "rdns" NID)

"Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen" <ichen@kuatrotech.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ichen@kuatrotech.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA68612D618 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kuatrotechnology.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SexD43wq1vnN for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01on0046.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.2.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CAB912D532 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kuatrotechnology.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-kuatrotech-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=hvemonkhbmfEyoCbzUDZwvlxAxize+j2bFZX9LVGOyo=; b=BFBD49qc/lYVf32eoiJPqugrJv3zGG5WDJiTtsEb/sfUQ5Z8+8hMkFHAOsQkkNCPtztvw4D2Bw86kBsk36DSDuErwCO73bliUilKsE2+HWSjQgZRMhw9TLRxEya1HuzpGVCrH4S5gTcbOX6p3P+w0Hv2OLc2/7BWA0kRfAJRzUY=
Received: from DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.158.140) by DB5PR06MB0949.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.158.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.434.16; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:21:06 +0000
Received: from DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.158.140]) by DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.158.140]) with mapi id 15.01.0434.021; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:21:06 +0000
From: "Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen" <ichen@kuatrotech.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Subject: RE: draft-chen-rdns-urn-05 (Re: two-week review: registering formal "rdns" NID)
Thread-Topic: draft-chen-rdns-urn-05 (Re: two-week review: registering formal "rdns" NID)
Thread-Index: AQHRgVfFPCmJuC06X0+QeF5QeuYuv59ftOHA
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:21:06 +0000
Message-ID: <DB5PR06MB0950179FD3BA6617C2B830D4D08C0@DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB5PR06MB0950D42A59AA62292470E12DD0B30@DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> (ichen@kuatrotech.com) <87vb4j5x4v.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87vb4j5x4v.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ariadne.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; ariadne.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kuatrotech.com;
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 35968e72-be83-447d-2b4c-08d34f7337d0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5PR06MB0949; 5:vK3859Cua6W9qvkvth8mGRRbZe8m9O9JudOZ8hRmY+VZ57QYXGSkhSic2SgA9T2e92IStp81pkeUcxdyi+xqVTk1zxl9zYZg896X/M8RFkcLxJbYTZJ7LfldEKu1UDhXwmfgRMfJ7HP8f6/t8xtm8w==; 24:vAJMDJS70SV3FrTufA4mPM/i8vyOLIgtjgs3VlaWNW54ZA50EeQGH4KBpjXyN/IBNgL8EX/acZgb/BAKrOoN0YMWdImU9wL53hJERG+F15s=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5PR06MB0949;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB5PR06MB094978831479A415A13ADA72D08C0@DB5PR06MB0949.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040046)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041046)(6043046); SRVR:DB5PR06MB0949; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5PR06MB0949;
x-forefront-prvs: 088552DE73
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(164054003)(230783001)(106116001)(122556002)(74316001)(19580395003)(86362001)(189998001)(92566002)(5003600100002)(19580405001)(54356999)(110136002)(66066001)(76176999)(76576001)(50986999)(5002640100001)(10400500002)(3660700001)(102836003)(6116002)(2906002)(87936001)(4326007)(1220700001)(1096002)(81166005)(3846002)(2900100001)(2950100001)(15975445007)(5008740100001)(5004730100002)(586003)(77096005)(3280700002)(33656002)(11100500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR06MB0949; H:DB5PR06MB0950.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kuatrotech.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Mar 2016 21:21:06.4188 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 99314f4e-50ab-4d4e-a9c6-b21b0c887384
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR06MB0949
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/pibno5XNyXvAhuJ9bW6lKJjDA0w>
Cc: "urn-nid@apps.ietf.org" <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:21:12 -0000

Hi Dale,

Thanks very much for the corrections.  I updated to version -06.

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-rdns-urn-06.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-rdns-urn/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-rdns-urn-06
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-chen-rdns-urn-06

Thanks,
Helen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale R. Worley [mailto:worley@ariadne.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 4:50 PM
> To: Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen <ichen@kuatrotech.com>
> Cc: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-chen-rdns-urn-05 (Re: two-week review: registering formal
> "rdns" NID)
> 
> This version clarifies and simplifies many issues and I think it is nearly ready for
> publication.  However, there are two issues:
> 
>        <rdns-trans>     ::= <lower> | <number> | <others> | <reserved>
> 
> Comparing with RFC 2141, "<others>" should be "<other>".
> 
> The alternative "<reserved>" should be removed.  In RFC 2141, I see:
> 
>    <trans>       ::= <upper> | <lower> | <number> | <other> | <reserved>
> 
> However the final alternative in that production is not to be used in practice.  Its
> expansion is:
> 
>    <reserved>    ::= '%" | "/" | "?" | "#"
> 
> However, the immediately following text in 2141 states that "%" is to be used
> only to introduce %-escapes (which this draft does in the production "<rdns-
> URN-char>").  And the remaining three characters are described as
> 
>    RFC 1630 [2] reserves the characters "/", "?", and "#" for particular
>    purposes. The URN-WG has not yet debated the applicability and
>    precise semantics of those purposes as applied to URNs. Therefore,
>    these characters are RESERVED for future developments.  Namespace
>    developers SHOULD NOT use these characters in unencoded form, but
>    rather use the appropriate %-encoding for each character.
> 
> Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email