URN Namespace for Certificates (draft-seantek-certspec-00)

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E9821F8652 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oC2sxVsxzGTe for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA12121F864F for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [76.173.239.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3097B50A65; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 03:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FFA8F52.9020904@seantek.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:59:14 -0700
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
Subject: URN Namespace for Certificates (draft-seantek-certspec-00)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080506010607010101060800"
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:59:01 -0000

Greetings URN-NID Maintainers:

I'm Sean Leonard, representing both myself, and Penango, Inc. At 
Penango, we deal with certificates quite a bit.

I have submitted an Internet-Draft that provides a specification for 
Uniform Resource Names for digital (X.509/PKIX) certificates. As the 
Apps WG is in charge of URNs (and urnbis), I would like to pursue 
standardization here. PKIX folks will be notified, however, if they want 
to make any comments.

Filename:	 draft-seantek-certspec
Revision:	 00
Title:		 A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Certificates
Creation date:	 2012-07-08
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 13
URL:http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-certspec-00.txt
Status:http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-certspec
Htmlized:http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-certspec-00


The goal of "certspec" is to provide uniform, permanent, textual formats 
for identifying individual certificates. Such a URN can then be passed 
to a resolver to retrieve the certificate in diverse ways. Additionally, 
such a URN can be stored by diverse applications and shared between 
applications without resorting to application-specific formats.

The Internet-Draft requests registration of "cert" as a URN NID.

I welcome any feedback or comments on this Internet-Draft.

Thank you,

Sean Leonard