Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 27 October 2012 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F8E21F852E for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXaKBoyFH26e for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F72921F8553 for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b11so3268027lam.31 for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rZji942fhIr3XlQeaAVc4m9thlzQ5BMPCc4jam0eUl4=; b=lzY3XIUY3Wka/ea4R3Pgg3wsZtPYAezudV6dZ4l/8YdbJoR8tg2E9HnYQTSYdyJPax PyYN2TjYZIqkQoEHGZN/OgW3GHz8UGzRcvVOSo/5nrzmtPrm8x8Skn7zqL9bXD2J0Wtx f+4PHz05+rgtKAwvQsGXDDLfp/0lvWc7hm95b9VvC373SWbtH2dKz4ObJKUm/Rt6pnUF 0w49+qBDNvuvh8l1A4NXjDhalETtshZEV5fanOne27Zx6fwWuXJgaQ3mwtHaOF2vM7OL flrJ+CjRDpvd4IcvK+Jr6tB1UFuUdkuDMheEjjKtxWHG1HNdOQkZq0r80frZQrrEUvoS 5JqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.105.68 with SMTP id gk4mr22642018lab.48.1351348887211; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.99.131 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20121027010212.09337088@resistor.net>
References: <CAAQiQRe+wCBmKfm7up8XY-4RxLnktZiz+nuanprygGcHAYdqAw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121027010212.09337088@resistor.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:41:27 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vaGakW4rrwb_2cOqwmqLTcCAt6Y
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDfdXar73t8w92xBa+Hv7QeaN94fA_VKcF0q2rVRrvcxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040714af63cec504cd0b6ec0
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:41:30 -0000

>
> This is conditional on the editor of the document committing to having the
> document ready for Last Call within a short time frame, let's say two
> months.
>

Indeed; we have a new schedule -- see the charter, and scroll to the bottom
for the milestones, here:
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/urnbis/charter/

I would like to see us meet those dates, to a reasonable approximation.
 That means that I'd like to see us get to WGLC on the two core docs
(2141bis and 3406bis) around the end of the year.

Barry