[urn] Transition of 2141bis and 3406bis

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 27 November 2012 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7802821F8755 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQccUuBMfRCg for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B8E21F8760 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so10577720lah.31 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=q6mzIxqUq/0rpxW905cWHz/TS5LSRIa6ValBG1udDyY=; b=XoAXXaTBv8LP5rxn80beB4ebtp5jLe9ZaGEO516EpYhyZFlPQCdURbKiXdOM/vj/oW wFl5bg+29HRHHoz0zJgm9KS/yhFFFbxGCMHy4I2rcZ7qtPAnJUritvlJC3PzLxMMUhQS s3RrnTLESalB/r7wyKh99b6SoSJ7Y8c/H5iF7uKHJTVDIC00v4dLlJ3yJ9D6+TPGeUea Hod2Cb0uNflkxtbAl+R15t9qymkFCIOlpR2MmkX5Kt/ESpVIcdL1E0c0fADuFaPz6pmx Dv+tmnyUWhOxI9MHSeI+87FT21qF+SFHKdPzNvBl0kF3RRydRKHjszHIDE6nv5dtiRMy rveQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.106.212 with SMTP id gw20mr15898275lab.8.1354048653285; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.12.52 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:37:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.11]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:37:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQReC-MXOpR4m3UHNJ0KQxHADfO2a4qduVoQC3qy5hHUSxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0420a695fcda4804cf8004d7
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmOhCB81HTsISsrneKglFyRNZuHPRhiTwJ2DvMdmkf3IWUT6TrQvz2vnwv6xpKKSZrn+u/
Subject: [urn] Transition of 2141bis and 3406bis
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:37:36 -0000

All,

With respect to moving to a new, smaller document encompassing our 2141bis
goal I see that there is consensus within this working group for making
this transition. Peter Saint-Andre has also submitted a 3406bis document
consistent with the same style as his 2141bis document. For consistency,
this new document will be used as a basis for this working group's 3406bis
goal going forward.

It should be noted that these new documents are not the final output of
this working group but are simply a new basis for the development of the
milestones we must achieve, and they will be based on consensus within this
working group and the IETF in accordance with IETF practices.

With regards to the historical context and motivations described in the
current set of documents, we will seek the addition of new milestones for
Informational track RFCs in which to capture this information.

-andy, URNBIS co-chair