Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal Request for EIC
worley@ariadne.com Wed, 17 November 2021 03:43 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10493A08B6 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 19:43:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RC2T97UUDJvO for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 19:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resdmta-a1p-077741.sys.comcast.net (resdmta-a1p-077741.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd01:2bb4::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D683A08B2 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 19:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.113]) by resdmta-a1p-077741.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id n8zBmI3oEXZmTnBrKmzF24; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 03:43:42 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20211018a; t=1637120622; bh=Hf5+Qwv8HamlEWue6Hes/3Xp5Pg5L138YJkOpVlBMas=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=DXP2T6cMLQ8WiKF3Ya/G8oPoBpyQCrHQuS/0VRxIS0UGB0KdmMYl2Xy85wu3tM6PU WPMFoxlu3PknJr6rwHWpGkpW0pIf74UODz3PkiiXC+rU0GWjwDE/sCca/YjE0Nvc4h 7NUY25i7k3xsHZcab6uaeGC7vLEogETrPHgAwFMffx4C8MDSq57hUneF7tJK4dIdHU eCHEpkyLgjYzqYjFGCqdqLFS9GQI+fp4qYAeZ1c5K5h15FBFuZKXYyGF20N6DFXTSA 7TEBLQ5cNUcP3zvtNrdQ+fcR0sNiD7nmMyxEthlJV5j6GWCGudDlXTzjxlBqucTn2t A8hER00nIAKFg==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430::943e]) by resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id nBrCmF4AO0nZPnBrCm7wZL; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 03:43:40 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1AH3hXbE127259 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:33 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1AH3hVoA127255; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:31 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Elena Nikitina <elena.nikitina@ext.entsoe.eu>
Cc: chavdar.ivanov@griddigit.eu, olivier.aine@entsoe.eu, urn@ietf.org, kristjan.vilgo@elering.ee
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR06MB74245EBBA5BBD50D8E017541DF959@PAXPR06MB7424.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> (elena.nikitina@ext.entsoe.eu)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:31 -0500
Message-ID: <87h7cbfnvg.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/3IDvvJW415Ub_NHF5NbTpIWDGYI>
Subject: Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal Request for EIC
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 03:43:51 -0000
Elena Nikitina <elena.nikitina@ext.entsoe.eu> writes: > Thank you very much for your feedback! Could you please clarify for us > how the approval process will advance from this point? Are any > additional actions expected from our side? I'm not an authority, but the experts are a committee of about a half-dozen people. So we should hear reviews from several others soon. I expect the reviews will be positive, so the chair will then summarize our collective approval and notify IANA, which maintains the official register of URN namespaces. I believe that will be the end of the process. Dale
- [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal Requ… Elena Nikitina
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … worley
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … Elena Nikitina
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … Hakala, Juha E
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … worley
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … Elena Nikitina
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] Reminder: Namespace Identifier: Formal … Peter Saint-Andre